Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs VW Golf - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 333 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 25200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW Golf?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the VW Golf costs 25200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 424 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: VW Golf manages with 1.10 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 4.30 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 233 km more than the VW Golf.
Golf
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Golf has a decisively edge – offering 333 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 165 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Golf is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the VW Golf performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 270 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: VW Golf pulls distinct stronger with 420 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW Golf is minimal lighter – 1307 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 9 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly perceptible more room – 523 L compared to 381 L. That’s a difference of about 142 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs slight better – up to 1283 L, which is about 46 L more than the VW Golf.
When it comes to payload, VW Golf barely noticeable takes the win – 508 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the VW Golf shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £25,200
VW Golf
Ford Puma
VW Golf
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
VW Golf
The VW Golf remains the everyman’s favourite — cleverly balanced, composed and just posh enough to feel grown-up without pretending to be something it’s not. It slips through town and eats up longer trips with a refined cabin, practical layout and a kindly, capable character that turns everyday driving into something a little bit special.
details
Ford Puma
VW Golf
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
25200 - 47600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 8.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
131 - 143 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
25 - 184 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1307 - 1662 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
273 - 381 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4282 - 4296 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1789 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1454 - 1483 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1129 - 1237 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
438 - 508 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 333 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
202 - 270 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 420 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 245 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, G, C, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.