Compare performance (130 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (29,500 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Townstar Compact Van or Ford Transit Connect?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan Townstar Compact Van is very slightly cheaper – starting at 29,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,347 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Townstar Compact Van offers very slightly more power – delivering 130 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers visibly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 75 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Nissan Townstar Compact Van offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Townstar Compact Van is a bit lighter – 1,399 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 176 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries barely more – 780 kg compared to 775 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
The Nissan Townstar Compact Van holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Townstar is a smart, no-nonsense compact van that makes city running and tight deliveries feel almost effortless thanks to tidy packaging and clever storage. It keeps things sensible on the wallet and the road, offering a comfortable driving position and useful tech without flashy frills — the kind of workhorse you'll actually enjoy parking at the kerb.
detailsThe Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,500 - 37,500 £
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
263 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 155 g/km
|
co2
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,399 - 1,908 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
571 - 775 kg
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Ford
|