Compare performance (213 HP vs 300 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 37,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan X-Trail or Renault Rafale?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to the competitive world of SUVs, two models aiming to make a significant mark in 2024 are the Nissan X-Trail and the Renault Rafale. Each brings unique qualities and technical innovations to the table, catering to different facets of driver needs. Here's a closer look to help determine which SUV meets your lifestyle requirements.
The 2024 Nissan X-Trail stands out for its engine versatility, offering both petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) and full hybrid options. It offers power outputs ranging from 163 to 213 HP, facilitated by a smooth CVT or a reduction gearbox for those who lean towards a more traditional driving feel. In contrast, the Renault Rafale offers a full hybrid and plug-in hybrid, with power straddling between 200 and 300 HP. This potency is delivered via an automatic gearbox, providing convenience in operation without sacrificing efficiency.
Performance metrics show both the X-Trail and the Rafale in favorable light. The X-Trail's acceleration ranges from a steady 9.6 seconds to a brisk 7 seconds for its top-tier model, yet it’s the introduction of all-wheel drive that provides additional traction and control. The Renault Rafale, meanwhile, races from 0 to 100 km/h in 6.4 seconds at its fastest, benefiting from a front-wheel-drive system that achieves a remarkable max speed of 180 km/h.
Fuel efficiency is where these models diverge quite distinctly. The X-Trail presents a reasonable consumption range between 5.7 and 6.9 L/100km, whereas the Rafale shines with a remarkable 4.7 L/100km consumption for its full hybrid and an astounding 0.6 L/100km when operating as a plug-in hybrid. These figures are complemented by their respective CO2 emissions; the Rafale impresses further with emissions as low as 14 g/km on the plug-in version.
For those concerned with interior space, the two SUVs offer varying accommodations. The X-Trail stands as an accommodating choice offering seating for up to seven passengers, supported by a trunk capacity of up to 585 liters. On the other hand, the Rafale majors in trunk space for its five-seat configuration, boasting an impressive 627 liters for maximum cargo room.
Aesthetically, both the X-Trail and the Rafale possess commanding presences on the road. The X-Trail measures 4680 mm in length, 1840 mm in width, and 1720 mm in height, giving it a lofty and robust look. The Rafale extends slightly longer and wider at 4710 mm and 1886 mm respectively, yet stands lower at 1613 mm, contributing to a sport-inspired aerodynamic profile. Both SUVs provide a striking visual, capturing onlookers' attention.
In summary, the Nissan X-Trail and Renault Rafale cater to different drivers' essences. The X-Trail offers versatility and capacity, ideal for families or those needing room to grow. Meanwhile, the Rafale appeals to those prioritizing efficiency and performance, particularly with the cutting-edge advancements in hybrid technology. Both are standout contenders in the ever-growing SUV market segment.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan X-Trail is slightly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Renault Rafale costs 37,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,557 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Rafale uses 2 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.7 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Rafale offers visibly more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Rafale is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is barely lighter – 1,668 kg compared to 1,734 kg. The difference is around 66 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Rafale offers only slightly more boot space – 627 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries visibly more – 574 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 130 kg.
The Renault Rafale stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
The Renault Rafale dresses bold coupé-inspired lines around a practical crossover body, turning heads without trying too hard. Inside it serves up a comfortable, well-equipped cabin and engaging driving manners, making it a clever choice for buyers who want a bit of panache with their daily commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
|
Price
37,700 - 49,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
97 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
co2
43 - 109 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
|
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,025 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
539 - 627 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
Width
1,886 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Payload
415 - 444 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 300 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 8.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 221 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España