VS

Nissan X-Trail vs Skoda Octavia Limousine comparison

Compare performance (213 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan X-Trail or Skoda Octavia Limousine?

Nissan X-Trail vs Skoda Octavia Limousine: Key differences

Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
details

Skoda Octavia Limousine

  • clearly cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X-Trail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Octavia Limousine is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,180 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Octavia Limousine uses 4.3 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

Octavia Limousine

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan X-Trail offers marginally more power – delivering 213 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Limousine is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.6 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan X-Trail delivers visibly more torque with 525 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 165 Nm more.

X-Trail

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Limousine is noticeably lighter – 1,351 kg compared to 1,668 kg. The difference is around 317 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Limousine offers barely more boot space – 600 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries marginally more – 574 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Octavia Limousine is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,000
Octavia Limousine

Skoda Octavia Limousine

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Nissan X-Trail
Skoda Octavia Limousine

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan X-Trail

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

details

Skoda Octavia Limousine

The Skoda Octavia Limousine blends space and sensible charm into a calm, grown-up package that feels smarter than its modest badge suggests. Practical, comfortable and quietly clever, it's the sort of car that makes everyday driving feel noticeably less mundane and keeps both your wallet and patience intact.

details
Nissan X-Trail
Skoda Octavia Limousine

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
Price
25,000 - 39,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
131 - 161 g/km
co2
111 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,537 kg
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
600 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,840 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
432 - 574 kg
Payload
503 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.6 - 10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, C
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.