Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Nissan X-Trail or Skoda Kodiaq fits your lifestyle better.
The SUV segment continues to evolve, lending itself to fierce competition among automakers. Two prominent contenders in this category are the Nissan X-Trail and Skoda Kodiaq. Both vehicles offer a wealth of features, comfort, and performance. In this article, we’ll delve into the technical aspects and innovations that set these SUVs apart from each other.
The Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a versatile range of engine options, including a Petrol MHEV and a full hybrid variant. The power outputs range from 163 HP to a robust 213 HP, with torque figures peaking at 525 Nm on the hybrid model. This allows the X-Trail to accelerate from 0-100 km/h in just 7 seconds, making it a quick performer in its class.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq boasts an impressive lineup of engines, including petrol, diesel, and a plugin hybrid option. The Kodiaq’s power ranges from 150 HP to a substantial 265 HP, depending on the variant, with torque topping out at 400 Nm. Acceleration times vary as well, with the quickest versions reaching 0-100 km/h in just 6.3 seconds, demonstrating Skoda’s capabilities in delivering performance.
The X-Trail employs a continuously variable transmission (CVT) and offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations. This versatility allows buyers to tailor their driving experience according to their preferences, whether it’s for urban commuting or off-road adventures.
Conversely, the Skoda Kodiaq features a dual-clutch automatic transmission that enhances gear shifts and optimizes fuel efficiency. Similar to the X-Trail, it provides options for both front-wheel and all-wheel drives, ensuring that it can handle various driving conditions effectively.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Nissan X-Trail holds a competitive edge with consumption figures as low as 5.7 L/100 km for certain variants. The hybrid options are particularly appealing for eco-conscious drivers. Its CO2 emissions range from 131 to 161 g/km, depending on the model and engine choice.
The Skoda Kodiaq, while offering a range of engines, also presents respectable efficiency. Its consumption figures hover between 5.3 to 8.2 L/100 km, and the CO2 emissions vary widely from 9 g/km for the plug-in hybrid to 186 g/km for the heavier variants. This showcases the Kodiaq’s adaptability across different powertrains.
Both SUVs are designed with passenger comfort in mind. The Nissan X-Trail can accommodate up to 7 passengers in its largest configuration, making it an excellent family option. It features a spacious trunk capacity of 585 liters, alongside modern tech advancements such as an intuitive infotainment system with connectivity options.
In comparison, the Skoda Kodiaq prioritizes space and usability as well, offering trunk capacities that can stretch up to an impressive 910 liters, depending on the seating configuration. Its interior is well-appointed with high-quality materials and a suite of technological features, providing drivers with a user-friendly interface and plenty of storage options.
Safety is a critical aspect for both manufacturers. The Nissan X-Trail includes numerous safety features such as automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control, which enhance driver confidence and safety on the road.
Similarly, the Skoda Kodiaq is packed with safety technology, including adaptive cruise control, multi-collision braking, and a comprehensive airbag system. Both vehicles are designed to meet high safety standards, ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.
Choosing between the Nissan X-Trail and Skoda Kodiaq ultimately boils down to individual preferences and lifestyle requirements. The X-Trail impresses with its hybrid performance and spacious interior, making it a solid choice for families. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq’s range of engines and superior trunk capacity make it a versatile and appealing option for those needing extra cargo space. Regardless of your choice, both SUVs promise to deliver comfort, reliability, and innovative technology.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan X-Trail has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34000 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 2820 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.70 L. The difference is about 5.30 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a to a small extent edge – offering 265 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs a bit better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Nissan X-Trail tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan X-Trail pulls evident stronger with 525 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 125 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Nissan X-Trail is minimal lighter – 1668 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 910 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 325 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 681 L more than the Nissan X-Trail.
When it comes to payload, Nissan X-Trail minimal takes the win – 574 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34000 - 50400 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
co2
9 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1668 - 1961 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
4680 mm
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1840 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1720 mm
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1396 - 1424 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
|
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1497 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The Nissan X-Trail is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España