Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Nissan X-Trail vs Skoda Superb Combi comparison
Compare performance (213 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 36,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan X-Trail or Skoda Superb Combi?
Nissan X-Trail vs Skoda Superb Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
X-Trail
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan X-Trail is barely cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Skoda Superb Combi costs 36,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,928 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Combi uses 1.2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.5 L/100km.
Superb Combi
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Superb Combi offers somewhat more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 213 HP. That’s roughly 52 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Combi is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Nissan X-Trail takes 7 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan X-Trail delivers visibly more torque with 525 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 125 Nm more.
X-Trail
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Combi is only slightly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,668 kg. The difference is around 93 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Combi offers a bit more boot space – 690 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 105 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Superb Combi carries marginally more – 584 kg compared to 574 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Combi stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,100
Skoda Superb Combi
Nissan X-Trail
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Nissan X-Trail
The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.
details
Skoda Superb Combi
The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.
details
Nissan X-Trail
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
|
Price
36,100 - 52,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
128 - 137 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
131 - 161 g/km
|
co2
28 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
432 - 574 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G, B
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.