VS

Nissan X-Trail vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (213 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan X-Trail or Suzuki Swace?

Nissan X-Trail vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • moderately lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X-Trail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Suzuki Swace is barely cheaper – starting at 31,900 £ , while the Nissan X-Trail costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,280 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swace uses 4.5 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Nissan X-Trail with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan X-Trail offers markedly more power – delivering 213 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan X-Trail is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

X-Trail

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Nissan X-Trail offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is moderately lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 1,668 kg. The difference is around 193 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki Swace offers very slightly more boot space – 596 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 11 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan X-Trail carries noticeably more – 574 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 214 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan X-Trail holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
X-Trail

Nissan X-Trail

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 213 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Nissan X-Trail
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Nissan X-Trail and the Toyota RAV4 are two of the most popular compact SUVs, each offering a distinct balance of comfort, space and driving character. This comparison will focus on their real-world strengths—practicality, fuel efficiency, safety tech and driving feel—to help you choose which …
Nissan X-Trail
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan X-Trail

The Nissan X-Trail is a roomy, no-nonsense family SUV that mixes sensible practicality with a quietly modern look, making it an easy choice for busy lives and weekend escapes. It drives with calm confidence, delivers a comfortable ride and sensible tech, and won’t demand drama while doing the everyday heavy lifting.

details
X-Trail - Dynamic High 22
X-Trail - Dynamic High 14
Nissan_Xtrail_High_043
Nissan_Xtrail_High_033

Reviews Nissan X-Trail

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Marcin
17 Feb 2026, 12:21:57

I drive an Outback every day; I had an X‑Trail as a courtesy car while mine was in for service. First impression after a few kilometres of driving — the suspension is a disaster. You get the feeling this car picks up every single imperfection in the tarmac. Also, at idle the engine causes noticeably more vibrations in the cabin than the Subaru. On the plus side, a more ergonomic gear lever and 360° cameras. But I wouldn’t swap...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
6 Feb 2026, 00:23:47

Beautiful, modern design, very good-quality materials, mega acceleration and power. Very modern, loaded with electronics. This is my second Nissan X‑Trail.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Shan Ak
24 Jan 2026, 14:20:58

I have 163 hp platinum premium pack . Car is going very smoothly and comfortable. Also powerful and useful details.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Nissan X-Trail
VW Tiguan
VS
Choosing between the X-Trail and the Tiguan comes down to priorities: space and practicality versus refinement and driving feel. This quick comparison will help you decide which suits your needs by weighing interior space, tech, comfort, fuel economy and ownership costs.
Ford Kuga
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Nissan X-Trail comes down to whether you prefer a sportier, tech-focused compact SUV or a more spacious, family-oriented and practical option. The Kuga offers sharper handling and up-to-date infotainment, while the X-Trail emphasizes cabin space, comfort and …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports, both cars deliver remarkable hybrid performance with a focus on fuel efficiency and practicality. The Suzuki Swace, essentially a rebadged version of the Corolla, offers nearly identical interiors and …
Dacia Jogger
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Dacia Jogger and Nissan X-Trail go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Dacia Jogger or the …
Hyundai Tucson
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Hyundai Tucson arrives with sharper styling, a high-tech cabin and punchy powertrain options — the gadget-forward, sporty choice for buyers who want flair and value. Nissan X‑Trail plays the practical card: roomier, more family-friendly and supremely comfortable on long runs, so pick the Tucson to …
Nissan X-Trail
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Nissan X-Trail and Renault Austral offer distinct features that cater to diverse driving preferences. The X-Trail excels with its robust all-wheel-drive capabilities and spacious interior, making it a top choice for families and outdoor enthusiasts. …
Nissan X-Trail
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV market, the Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander stand out with their distinct features and capabilities. The X-Trail boasts a spacious interior and advanced safety technology, making it an excellent choice for families, while the Outlander impresses with its …
Nissan Qashqai
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Nissan Qashqai and Nissan X-Trail go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Nissan Qashqai or …
Nissan X-Trail
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 50,500 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
131 - 161 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,668 - 1,961 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
177 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,840 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
432 - 574 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 213 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 9.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
300 - 525 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 157 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Nissan X-Trail?

The Nissan X-Trail is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.