VS

Renault Kangoo Compact Van vs Alpine A390 comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 470 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 57,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo Compact Van or Alpine A390?

Renault Kangoo Compact Van vs Alpine A390: Key differences

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • clearly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

Alpine A390

  • considerably more power
  • barely more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Alpine A390 costs 57,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,684 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Alpine A390 is barely more efficient: consuming 18.7 kWh/100km compared to 20.5 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo Compact Van. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Alpine A390 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 551 km, about 267 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.

A390

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 offers considerably more power – delivering 470 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 348 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A390 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 8.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A390 delivers considerably more torque with 824 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 554 Nm more.

Kangoo Compact Van

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is noticeably lighter – 1,639 kg compared to 2,121 kg. The difference is around 482 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries clearly more – 901 kg compared to 484 kg. That’s a difference of about 417 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A390 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £57,900
A390

Alpine A390

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 400 - 470 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 497 - 551 km
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.

details

Alpine A390

The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.

details
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Alpine A390

Costs and Consumption

Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
Price
57,900 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
Electric Range
497 - 551 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 151 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
Curb weight
2,121 - 2,124 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
532 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,885 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
670 - 901 kg
Payload
481 - 484 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Renault
Brand
Alpine
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.