Compare performance (122 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo Compact Van or Ford Transit Connect?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van is markedly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,631 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
Both models deliver identical power – 122 HP each.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Transit Connect is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 11.4 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers somewhat more torque with 320 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is very slightly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,639 kg. The difference is around 64 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries slightly more – 901 kg compared to 780 kg. That’s a difference of about 121 kg.
The Renault Kangoo Compact Van holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsThe Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
co2
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
670 - 901 kg
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Ford
|