Compare performance (122 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (22400 £ vs 21200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo Compact Van or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21200 £ , while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van costs 22400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1260 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Kangoo Compact Van manages with 5.10 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Toyota Proace City Compact Van: with 18.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 18.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.20 kWh.
As for electric range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 337 km, about 47 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a a bit edge – offering 136 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 11.10 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.60 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota Proace City Compact Van pulls barely noticeable stronger with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is barely noticeable lighter – 1358 kg compared to 1493 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs a bit better – up to 4900 L, which is about 600 L more than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van.
When it comes to payload, Toyota Proace City Compact Van minimal takes the win – 921 kg compared to 901 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsThe Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22400 - 37000 £
|
Price
21200 - 37700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
261 - 290 km
|
Electric Range
337 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
co2
0 - 150 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 61 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1493 - 1910 kg
|
Curb weight
1358 - 1837 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4486 - 4910 mm
|
Length
4401 - 4751 mm
|
|
Width
1860 mm
|
Width
1848 mm
|
|
Height
1854 - 1864 mm
|
Height
1860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 4900 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3300 - 4300 L
|
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Payload
560 - 921 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
Max Speed
135 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The Renault Kangoo Compact Van is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.