Compare performance (122 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (22,400 £ vs 21,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Kangoo Compact Van or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van is very slightly cheaper – starting at 21,200 £ , while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van costs 22,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,260 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Kangoo Compact Van uses 5.1 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is only slightly more efficient: consuming 18.5 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo Compact Van. That’s a difference of about 0.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van offers slightly more range – reaching up to 337 km, about 47 km more than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van offers a bit more power – delivering 136 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 11.1 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.6 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is barely faster – reaching 186 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Proace City Compact Van delivers very slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is marginally lighter – 1,358 kg compared to 1,493 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers moderately more capacity – up to 4,900 L, about 600 L more than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van carries very slightly more – 921 kg compared to 901 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsThe Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,400 - 37,000 £
|
Price
21,200 - 37,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
270 - 290 km
|
Electric Range
337 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
co2
0 - 150 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 61 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,493 - 1,910 kg
|
Curb weight
1,358 - 1,837 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,486 - 4,910 mm
|
Length
4,401 - 4,751 mm
|
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
1,854 - 1,864 mm
|
Height
1,860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,900 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,300 L
|
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Payload
560 - 921 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
Max Speed
135 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Toyota
|