Compare performance (269 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 22,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 44,956 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Transit Transporter offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 402 km, about 65 km more than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers substantially more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers noticeably more torque with 430 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Toyota Proace City Compact Van holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
22,400 - 37,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
337 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 149 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,358 - 1,837 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
560 - 921 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|