VS

Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs BMW X5 comparison

Compare performance (600 HP vs 625 HP), boot space and price (275,400 £ vs 77,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Rolls-Royce Cullinan or BMW X5?

Rolls-Royce Cullinan vs BMW X5: Key differences

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

details

BMW X5

3.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Cullinan

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

BMW X5 is significantly cheaper – starting at 77,600 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 197,829 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X5 uses 3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 13 L/100km.

X5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X5 offers marginally more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 600 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X5 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers moderately more torque with 900 Nm compared to 750 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BMW X5 is slightly lighter – 2,240 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 420 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW X5 offers moderately more boot space – 650 L compared to 555 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries somewhat more – 840 kg compared to 705 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW X5 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £77,600
X5

BMW X5

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 298 - 625 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3 - 12.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 105 km
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
BMW X5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details

BMW X5

The BMW X5 blends athletic handling with a roomy, premium interior, feeling equally at home on twisty country roads and the school-run car park. Its executive-lounge cabin and confident road presence make it a tempting choice for buyers who want comfort, capability and just a little bit of bragging rights.

details
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
BMW X5

Costs and Consumption

Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Price
77,600 - 144,400 £
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3 - 12.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
105 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
363 - 380 g/km
co2
68 - 289 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Curb weight
2,240 - 2,495 kg
Trunk capacity
555 L
Trunk capacity
500 - 650 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,000 mm
Width
2,004 - 2,015 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
840 kg
Payload
565 - 705 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Power HP
298 - 625 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Torque
540 - 750 Nm
Number of Cylinders
12
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Power kW
219 - 460 kW
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3
Engine capacity
2,993 - 4,395 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Rolls-Royce
Brand
BMW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.