VS

SsangYong Rexton vs Audi A3 Sportback comparison

Compare performance (202 HP vs 400 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Rexton or Audi A3 Sportback?

SsangYong Rexton vs Audi A3 Sportback: Key differences

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more trunk space
details

Audi A3 Sportback

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rexton

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi A3 Sportback is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the SsangYong Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,134 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 7.1 L/100km.

A3 Sportback

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers substantially more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 198 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 6.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers slightly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 59 Nm more.

Rexton

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is considerably lighter – 1,345 kg compared to 2,145 kg. The difference is around 800 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers significantly more boot space – 784 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 404 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries markedly more – 770 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 285 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A3 Sportback is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
A3 Sportback

Audi A3 Sportback

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 400 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 134 - 141 km
SsangYong Rexton
Audi A3 Sportback

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details

Audi A3 Sportback

The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.

details
SsangYong Rexton
Audi A3 Sportback

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
214 - 216 g/km
co2
25 - 211 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,685 kg
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
Length
4,850 mm
Length
-
Width
1,960 mm
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
Height
1,825 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
655 - 770 kg
Payload
410 - 485 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
202 HP
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
184 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
441 Nm
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
Power kW
148 kW
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3

General

Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
Audi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.