Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
SsangYong Rexton vs Audi A6 e-tron Avant comparison
Compare performance (202 HP vs 551 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 55,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Rexton or Audi A6 e-tron Avant?
SsangYong Rexton vs Audi A6 e-tron Avant: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Rexton
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
SsangYong Rexton is noticeably cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Avant costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,108 £.
A6 e-tron Avant
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers clearly more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 349 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 6.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is clearly faster – reaching 240 km/h, while the SsangYong Rexton tops out at 184 km/h. The difference is around 56 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Avant delivers substantially more torque with 855 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 414 Nm more.
Rexton
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Rexton is very slightly lighter – 2,145 kg compared to 2,185 kg. The difference is around 40 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers clearly more boot space – 784 L compared to 502 L. That’s a difference of about 282 L.
For maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Rexton offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,977 L, about 555 L more than the Audi A6 e-tron Avant.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries markedly more – 770 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 270 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £55,200
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
SsangYong Rexton
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
SsangYong Rexton
The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.
details
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant wraps Audi's trademark refinement into a sleek electric estate that looks at home in the city or on the open road. Inside it's grown-up and tech-forward with practical packaging for family life, delivering a composed, confident drive that makes everyday hauling feel a bit more special and slightly futuristic.
details
SsangYong Rexton
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
|
Price
55,200 - 100,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
539 - 716 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
|
co2
214 - 216 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
|
Curb weight
2,185 - 2,410 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
|
Trunk capacity
502 L
|
|
Length
4,850 mm
|
Length
4,928 mm
|
|
Width
1,960 mm
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
|
Height
1,825 mm
|
Height
1,504 - 1,527 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 L
|
|
Payload
655 - 770 kg
|
Payload
470 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
|
|
Max Speed
184 km/h
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
|
Torque
441 Nm
|
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
148 kW
|
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
Brand
Audi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.