VS

SsangYong Torres vs Audi A3 Sportback comparison

Compare performance (207 HP vs 400 HP), boot space and price (33,800 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – SsangYong Torres or Audi A3 Sportback?

SsangYong Torres vs Audi A3 Sportback: Key differences

SsangYong Torres

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Audi A3 Sportback

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • considerably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Torres

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi A3 Sportback is visibly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the SsangYong Torres costs 33,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,848 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Torres with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 6.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the SsangYong Torres offers significantly more range – reaching up to 462 km, about 321 km more than the Audi A3 Sportback.

A3 Sportback

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers considerably more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 193 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers visibly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 339 Nm. That’s about 161 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is moderately lighter – 1,345 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 153 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Torres offers clearly more boot space – 703 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 323 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Torres carries somewhat more – 552 kg compared to 485 kg. That’s a difference of about 67 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A3 Sportback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
A3 Sportback

Audi A3 Sportback

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 400 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
  • Electric Range 134 - 141 km
SsangYong Torres
Audi A3 Sportback

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

SsangYong Torres

SsangYong Torres cuts a rugged, purposeful silhouette that feels more expensive than its price tag, offering generously practical packaging and a no-nonsense feature set. It drives with surprisingly assured manners and genuine off-road appetite, making it a clever choice for buyers who want real SUV capability without badge snobbery.

details

Audi A3 Sportback

The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.

details
SsangYong Torres
Audi A3 Sportback

Costs and Consumption

Price
33,800 - 44,600 £
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
462 km
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 207 g/km
co2
25 - 211 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,618 kg
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,685 kg
Trunk capacity
703 L
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
Length
4,700 mm
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
Height
1,710 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,662 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
552 kg
Payload
410 - 485 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 207 HP
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
191 - 194 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
280 - 339 Nm
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
Power kW
120 - 152 kW
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
Brand
SsangYong
Brand
Audi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.