Compare performance (169 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (40,000 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Subaru Outback or Ford Transit Transporter?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Subaru Outback is clearly cheaper – starting at 40,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,289 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers noticeably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 169 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers significantly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 252 Nm. That’s about 178 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Subaru Outback is the do-it-all wagon for buyers who want SUV capability without the SUV bulk, blending rugged confidence with everyday civility. It's practical, dependable, and built to shrug off rough gravel tracks or rainy commutes with a grin — ideal for buyers who actually use their vehicles, not just park them for show.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,000 - 44,400 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
8.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
193 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,643 - 1,676 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
561 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
524 - 557 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
169 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
252 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
124 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Subaru
|
Brand
Ford
|