Compare performance (680 HP vs 658 HP), boot space and price (73,700 £ vs 95,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX90 or Mercedes EQS SUV?
The electric vehicle market is rapidly expanding, with automakers pushing the boundaries of innovation. Two such titans, the Mercedes EQS SUV and the Volvo EX90, represent the pinnacle of luxury electric SUVs. How do they stack up against each other? Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations that set these vehicles apart.
The Mercedes EQS SUV offers a versatile range of powertrains, catering to varied driving preferences. It comes with power outputs ranging from 360 HP to a staggering 658 HP, powered by electric motors that can propel this luxury SUV from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 4.4 seconds. The maximum speed for this vehicle is capped at 210 km/h. The torque variants stand out, delivering between 568 Nm and 950 Nm, ensuring a smooth and potent performance.
On the other side, the Volvo EX90 provides a more streamlined range of options, offering power ratings of 279 HP, 408 HP, and 517 HP. Acceleration is impressive too, with the EX90 reaching 100 km/h from a standstill in just 4.9 seconds. Its maximum velocity is slightly lower, limited to 180 km/h, with torque offerings of 490 Nm to a robust 910 Nm.
The EQS SUV boasts an exceptional electric range, whispering up to 709 km on a single charge, while being remarkably efficient with consumption figures ranging between 19.1 kWh/100km and 22.5 kWh/100km. Its high capacity batteries are rated at 118 kWh and 108.4 kWh.
The Volvo EX90 also impresses with its range, capable of traveling up to 614 km. With an energy consumption between 19.9 kWh/100km and 20.8 kWh/100km, it strikes a commendable balance between efficiency and power, supported by battery capacities of 101 kWh and 107 kWh.
Both models epitomize luxury and comfort, yet they differ slightly in interior offerings. The EQS SUV can comfortably accommodate up to five passengers with a relatively high trunk capacity of 645 liters. Its spacious interior is complemented by dimensions of 5125 mm in length, 2034 mm in width, and 1721 mm in height.
Meanwhile, the Volvo EX90 offers a versatile seating arrangement for up to six passengers, though its trunk capacity is a more modest 310 liters. It measures 5037 mm long, 1964 mm wide, and 1744 mm high, providing a slightly more compact option without sacrificing comfort.
These electric giants are more than just modes of transport; they are statements of sustainability, innovation, and luxury. The Mercedes EQS SUV stands out with its range, power variety, and expansive trunk space, while the Volvo EX90 offers substantial power and a unique six-seater configuration. Ultimately, both vehicles represent the future of automotive innovation, leaving potential buyers spoiled for choice depending on their priorities.
As we move towards an electrified future, both the Mercedes EQS SUV and Volvo EX90 showcase what luxury and environmental responsibility can look like in harmony.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Volvo EX90 is visibly cheaper – starting at 73,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,267 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX90 is somewhat more efficient: consuming 17.8 kWh/100km compared to 19.6 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQS SUV. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers moderately more range – reaching up to 695 km, about 75 km more than the Volvo EX90.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers only slightly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 658 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Mercedes EQS SUV takes 4.4 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS SUV delivers only slightly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 870 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX90 is barely lighter – 2,555 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 140 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX90 carries barely more – 585 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
The Volvo EX90 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.
details
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
73,700 - 91,700 £
|
Price
95,000 - 212,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,764 kg
|
Curb weight
2,695 - 3,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,125 mm
|
|
Width
1,964 mm
|
Width
1,959 - 2,034 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,718 - 1,721 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,100 L
|
|
Payload
544 - 585 kg
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España