Compare performance (340 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (43,600 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW ID. Buzz Cargo or Ford Transit Transporter?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW ID. Buzz Cargo is substantially cheaper – starting at 43,600 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,745 £.
As for electric range, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 53 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo offers markedly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW ID. Buzz Cargo delivers visibly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 249 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 3.
The VW ID. Buzz Cargo is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW ID. Buzz Cargo marries retro Volkswagen charm with a thoroughly modern electric work van, offering a surprisingly spacious and practical load area wrapped in friendly, iconic styling. It's a smart pick for urban tradespeople and small businesses who want quiet, effortless driving, lower running costs and easy maneuverability — with a healthy dash of nostalgia on the job.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,600 - 51,400 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.2 - 20.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
330 - 455 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,264 - 2,510 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,712 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,985 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
1,932 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,900 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
640 - 753 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
145 - 160 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Ford
|