VS

VW Polo vs Lynk & Co 01 comparison

Compare performance (207 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (17,300 £ vs 36,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW Polo or Lynk & Co 01?

VW Polo vs Lynk & Co 01: Key differences

VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter
details

Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW Polo is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,300 £ , while the Lynk & Co 01 costs 36,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,594 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lynk & Co 01 uses 0.9 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the VW Polo with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.

01

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 offers noticeably more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Polo is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 6.5 s, while the Lynk & Co 01 takes 7.7 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 01 delivers considerably more torque with 535 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 215 Nm more.

Polo

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW Polo is significantly lighter – 1,143 kg compared to 1,935 kg. The difference is around 792 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lynk & Co 01 offers visibly more boot space – 466 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW Polo carries very slightly more – 457 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 42 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 01 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,900
01

Lynk & Co 01

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 75 km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Polo is the sharp, no-nonsense hatchback that nails everyday practicality — nimble in town, economical to run and pleasantly composed on the motorway. The VW Taigo swaps a bit of luggage room and rear headroom for SUV flair, higher seating and a more eye-catching cabin, so pick the Polo for …
VW ID.3
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Polo pits Volkswagen's all-electric compact against its conventional small hatchback, highlighting a choice between emissions-free efficiency and traditional practicality. The ID.3 emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and a spacious cabin, while the Polo offers lower …
VW Polo
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

VW Polo

The Polo is a well-built, comfortable hatchback that blends a refined cabin and composed manners into a compact package. It's easy to live with day to day, offering sensible space, tidy controls and reassuring quality that make it a practical choice for city or longer trips.

details
DB2021AU00726_medium
DB2021AU00728_medium
DB2021AU00732_medium
DB2021AU00735_medium
DB2021AU00736_medium
DB2021AU00741_medium

Reviews VW Polo

4.2 (4 Reviews)
rate
Michel
13 Jun 2026, 15:24:46

Nice, spacious car with many options available (panoramic roof and travel assist).

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Lynk & Co 01

The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.

details
381453-front_side_view-936758-original-1615303870
381443-side_view-fe0530-original-1615303770
381451-front_interior-54cae9-original-1615303868

Reviews Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
Vermeeren
9 May 2026, 12:57:59

Looks tough, has all the options. Good electric range. My wife drives to and from work every day. Because of that we only have to refuel once every 1–2 months. Drives wonderfully. Great sound system. A pleasure to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Lee Burkitt
15 Mar 2026, 04:44:31

I have the 01 from 2022 and have had it for 2 years. It's been a lovely car to own and drive. I return from Spain to the UK twice a year in it and it's a pleasure to travel in. The only grip has been the infotainment system which has been buggy and slow. I had the software updated a few weeks ago at the Volvo garage as the over the air option does not work. This has made the infotainment system acceptable now.

It takes a while to get used to the seats for me as the base is quite hard but now I feel they are very confortable. I charge it everyday in the carpark and I use it 90% of the time on electric mode. It does the 70km on a full charge as stated and in petrol mode I'm getting around 16km a litre or 75 a gallon, the engine is only used on motorways.

Aftersales service is patchy here in Spain. My nearest dealer is about a 40 min drive from here, it's not like owning a Renault where there's a dealer everywhere, I've only had to take it there twice, once turned out to be a stone in a brake caliper causing a squeak and the other for the software update.

I highly recommend these cars!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
The verstegen
6 Jan 2026, 09:56:38

Top car.
Quality and price.
Great caravan tow vehicle.
A shame there's so much driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW Polo
VS
The Volkswagen Golf and Volkswagen Polo are two of the brand’s best-known hatchbacks, with the Golf leaning toward greater space, refinement and tech while the Polo focuses on affordability, city-friendly size and economy. This comparison will show where the Golf justifies its extra cost and where …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Mazda 2
VW Polo
VS
Choosing between the Mazda 2 and the VW Polo comes down to whether you prefer a sporty, driver-focused small hatchback or a more refined, practical everyday car. Both deliver good fuel economy and solid build quality, but the Mazda 2 leans toward engaging handling and style while the VW Polo …
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The Lynk & Co 01 is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort and value, while the Lynk & Co 08 is a larger, more upscale coupe‑style SUV aimed at style and premium features. Both share the brand’s modern tech and connectivity, but the 01 prioritises space and economy whereas the 08 …
BYD Seal U
Lynk & Co 01
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Lynk & Co 01 gives you two very different takes on modern mobility — one rooted in BYD’s electric tech and the other in Lynk & Co’s crossover practicality. I’ll run through design, driving dynamics, technology, efficiency and ownership so you can pick the better fit …
Toyota Yaris
VW Polo
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris and the VW Polo comes down to whether you prioritise reliability and efficiency or a more refined drive and cabin quality. Both are compact, practical hatchbacks ideal for city life, but the Yaris leans toward excellent fuel economy and low running costs while the …
VW Polo
VW ID.Polo
VS
The VW Polo and VW ID.Polo compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Opel Corsa
VW Polo
VS
Opel Corsa and VW Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
VW Polo
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
Price
17,300 - 30,800 £
Price
36,900 - 40,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
75 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
116 - 148 g/km
co2
20 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,143 - 1,378 kg
Curb weight
1,935 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,751 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
432 - 457 kg
Payload
415 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 207 HP
Power HP
280 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 15.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
93 - 320 Nm
Torque
535 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
59 - 152 kW
Power kW
206 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
VW
Brand
Lynk & Co
What drive types are available for the VW Polo?

The VW Polo is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.