Lexus NX alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Lexus NX, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Lexus NX

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Lexus NX and are good next research steps.

from £42,800
CR-V

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 78 km

Honda CR-V as a suitable alternative to Lexus NX

In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Lexus NX stand out for their unique strengths. While the CR-V impresses with its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, the Lexus NX offers a more luxurious feel and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles will depend on whether buyers prioritize practicality or premium experience in their daily drives.

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

Quick data check: Honda CR-V

  • clearly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • very slightly cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
from £28,300
LBX

Lexus LBX

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.5 - 4.8 L/100km

Quick data check: Lexus LBX

  • considerably more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
from £48,900
RZ

Lexus RZ

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 227 - 408 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 - 18.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 457 - 559 km

Lexus RZ as a suitable alternative to Lexus NX

In the battle between the Lexus NX and Lexus RZ, both models showcase the brand’s commitment to luxury and performance. The NX offers a traditional crossover experience with a versatile powertrain lineup, while the RZ, as Lexus's first all-electric SUV, emphasizes sustainability without sacrificing style. Ultimately, choosing between the two will depend on whether you prefer a hybrid experience or the innovative electric edge of the RZ.

The Lexus RZ brings Lexus' trademark quiet luxury to the electric SUV world, wrapping poised handling and a plush, well-crafted cabin in a calm, composed package. It won't shout about raw figures — instead it trades headline numbers for smooth power delivery, fuss-free tech and an effortless refinement that will suit buyers who want electric convenience without losing the luxury experience.

Quick data check: Lexus RZ

  • barely cheaper
  • moderately lighter
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km

Quick data check: Mazda CX-60

  • clearly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • barely lighter
  • only slightly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
from £30,000
CX-5

Mazda CX-5

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 141 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7 - 7.4 L/100km

Mazda CX-5 as a suitable alternative to Lexus NX

The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun behind the wheel. Both vehicles boast a striking design and impressive safety ratings, but the choice ultimately depends on whether buyers value luxury or spirited performance.

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

Quick data check: Mazda CX-5

  • clearly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially cheaper
  • moderately lighter
from £41,900
XC40

Volvo XC40

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 6.5 L/100km

Quick data check: Volvo XC40

  • noticeably more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly cheaper
  • only slightly lighter
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.