Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alfa Romeo Junior vs Polestar 2 – Which car suits you better?
Two cars, one duel: Alfa Romeo Junior meets Polestar 2.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Junior
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Alfa Romeo Junior has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25700 £, while the Polestar 2 costs 42000 £. That’s a price difference of around 16320 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Polestar 2: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Alfa Romeo Junior with 15.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.30 kWh.
As for range, the Polestar 2 performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 659 km, about 249 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.
2
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 2 has a clearly edge – offering 476 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 196 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 2 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Alfa Romeo Junior takes 5.90 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs barely noticeable better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Polestar 2 tops out at 205 km/h. The difference is around 1 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 2 pulls decisively stronger with 740 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 395 Nm difference.
Junior
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is clearly lighter – 1380 kg compared to 2015 kg. The difference is around 635 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers barely noticeable more room – 415 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Alfa Romeo Junior performs somewhat better – up to 1280 L, which is about 185 L more than the Polestar 2.
When it comes to payload, Polestar 2 barely noticeable takes the win – 421 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Polestar 2 proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Polestar 2 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £42,000
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 2
Alfa Romeo Junior
The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.
details
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
Polestar 2
Der Polestar 2 beeindruckt mit seinem klaren, skandinavischen Design und einer hochwertigen Verarbeitung, die sowohl innen als auch außen zu sehen ist. Besonders auffallend ist das futuristische Cockpit mit einem innovativen Infotainment-System, das auf Android basiert und nahtlose Konnektivität bietet. Zusätzlich bietet das Modell ein exzellentes Fahrgefühl mit dynamischen Fahreigenschaften, das selbst anspruchsvolle Fahrer begeistert.
details
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Alfa Romeo Junior
Polestar 2
|
@ Alfa Romeo / Stellantis Media
|
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25700 - 41600 £
|
Price
42000 - 57400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
|
Electric Range
554 - 659 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
78 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 119 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1689 kg
|
Curb weight
2015 - 2188 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
|
Trunk capacity
405 L
|
|
Length
4173 mm
|
Length
4606 mm
|
|
Width
1781 mm
|
Width
1859 mm
|
|
Height
1505 - 1538 mm
|
Height
1473 - 1479 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1205 - 1280 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1095 L
|
|
Payload
390 - 420 kg
|
Payload
375 - 421 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 476 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 km/h
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
490 - 740 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 350 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Polestar
|
What drive types are available for the Alfa Romeo Junior?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.