VS

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Polestar 2 comparison

Compare performance (280 HP vs 476 HP), boot space and price (26,100 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Junior or Polestar 2?

Alfa Romeo Junior vs Polestar 2: Key differences

Alfa Romeo Junior

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space

Polestar 2

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • barely more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Junior

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Alfa Romeo Junior is clearly cheaper – starting at 26,100 £ , while the Polestar 2 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,891 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Polestar 2 is barely more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 15.1 kWh/100km for the Alfa Romeo Junior. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Polestar 2 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 659 km, about 249 km more than the Alfa Romeo Junior.

2

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 2 offers substantially more power – delivering 476 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 196 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 2 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Alfa Romeo Junior takes 5.9 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Alfa Romeo Junior is barely faster – reaching 206 km/h, while the Polestar 2 tops out at 205 km/h. The difference is around 1 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 2 delivers considerably more torque with 740 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 395 Nm more.

Junior

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alfa Romeo Junior is substantially lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 2,015 kg. The difference is around 635 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers very slightly more boot space – 415 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Alfa Romeo Junior offers slightly more capacity – up to 1,280 L, about 185 L more than the Polestar 2.

When it comes to payload, the Polestar 2 carries marginally more – 421 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Polestar 2 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,000
2

Polestar 2

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 476 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 554 - 659 km
Alfa Romeo Junior
Polestar 2

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Alfa Romeo Junior

The Alfa Romeo Junior captures the essence of Italian design with its sleek lines and compact dimensions, making it an icon of elegance and performance. With a spirited driving experience and a charming retro aesthetic, it appeals to enthusiasts and casual drivers alike. This delightful car embodies the brand's rich heritage while remaining a fun and engaging option for those seeking a unique automotive experience.

details

Polestar 2

The Polestar 2 is a crisp, Scandinavian-styled electric liftback that pairs minimalist luxury with a focused, driver's attitude. It feels agile and composed whether you’re commuting or heading out for the weekend, with a tech-forward cabin and enough personality to make everyday driving a bit more fun.

details
Alfa Romeo Junior
Polestar 2

Costs and Consumption

Price
26,100 - 41,600 £
Price
42,000 - 57,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 17.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.8 kWh/100km
Electric Range
344 - 410 km
Electric Range
554 - 659 km
Battery Capacity
0.4 - 51 kWh
Battery Capacity
78 kWh
co2
0 - 119 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
44 - 45 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,689 kg
Curb weight
2,015 - 2,188 kg
Trunk capacity
340 - 415 L
Trunk capacity
405 L
Length
4,173 mm
Length
4,606 mm
Width
1,781 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
1,505 - 1,538 mm
Height
1,473 - 1,479 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,205 - 1,280 L
Max trunk capacity
1,095 L
Payload
390 - 420 kg
Payload
375 - 421 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 280 HP
Power HP
272 - 476 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.4 s
Max Speed
150 - 206 km/h
Max Speed
205 km/h
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Torque
490 - 740 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
107 - 207 kW
Power kW
200 - 350 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alfa Romeo
Brand
Polestar
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.