Compare performance (520 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (51,900 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alfa Romeo Stelvio or Mazda CX-5?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the fiercely competitive SUV market, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio and the Mazda CX-5 stand out with their unique blend of performance, style, and innovation. Both vehicles cater to drivers who crave the spaciousness of an SUV without compromising on performance. Let’s dive into the details and see how these two popular models compare against each other.
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio embodies Italian elegance with its sleek lines and distinctive front grille. This SUV stands at a length of 4687 to 4701 mm, a width of 1903 to 1955 mm, and a height of 1689 to 1693 mm, giving it a commanding presence on the road.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-5 offers a more subtle yet sophisticated design typical of Japanese craftsmanship. It measures 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height. While slightly smaller, the CX-5’s dimensions deliver agility and ease of maneuverability, particularly suited for urban environments.
The engine lineup for the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is truly impressive, offering both petrol and diesel options with power outputs ranging from 210 to a remarkable 520 HP. With its top-performing versions delivering a max speed of up to 285 km/h and an acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as little as 3.8 seconds, the Stelvio is designed for adrenaline enthusiasts. Its all-wheel-drive system further enhances traction and control, promising a thrilling driving experience.
Conversely, the Mazda CX-5 focuses on balanced performance, featuring petrol MHEV and diesel engines that produce between 150 and 194 HP. Although less powerful than the Stelvio, the CX-5 offers a comfortable driving experience with a top speed of 208 km/h and a decent acceleration time of around 9.2 to 11.1 seconds. The choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive caters to different driving preferences and conditions.
Fuel economy is an important consideration for SUV owners. The Stelvio's consumption varies between 6 to 11.8 L/100km, reflecting its performance-oriented engines. CO2 emissions are rated from 157 to 267 g/km, placing the Stelvio in the F and G efficiency classes.
In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 shines in this department, offering a more frugal consumption range of 5.6 to 7.6 L/100km, depending on the engine and drivetrain configuration. With CO2 emissions rated between 146 and 173 g/km and efficiency classes E and F, the CX-5 is a more environmentally friendly choice.
Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers, with the Stelvio providing a slightly larger trunk capacity of 525 L compared to the CX-5’s 510-522 L. The Stelvio’s luxurious touches and high-end finishes cater to those seeking a premium experience, while the CX-5 impresses with its ergonomic design and user-friendly technology.
Choosing between the Alfa Romeo Stelvio and Mazda CX-5 comes down to individual preferences. If unparalleled performance and Italian flair are your priorities, then the Stelvio is the obvious choice. However, if economical fuel consumption, practicality, and subtle design appeal more, the CX-5 stands out as the ideal SUV.
No matter which you choose, both the Stelvio and the CX-5 offer compelling packages that promise satisfaction and joy, affirming their places in the crowded SUV landscape.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-5 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Alfa Romeo Stelvio costs 51,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,951 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Alfa Romeo Stelvio uses 6 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio offers clearly more power – delivering 520 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 379 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alfa Romeo Stelvio is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 6.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Alfa Romeo Stelvio delivers considerably more torque with 600 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 362 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is somewhat lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,820 kg. The difference is around 191 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers very slightly more boot space – 583 L compared to 525 L. That’s a difference of about 58 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries marginally more – 601 kg compared to 590 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio combines Italian artistry with sporty performance, making it a standout in the SUV market. Its dynamic design captures the essence of elegance and agility, while the interior offers a driver-focused experience that enhances every journey. With a perfect blend of luxury and power, the Stelvio is ideal for those seeking both style and substance on the road.
details
The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
51,900 - 93,300 £
|
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6 - 11.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
157 - 267 g/km
|
co2
157 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,820 - 1,925 kg
|
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
525 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,690 mm
|
|
Width
1,903 - 1,955 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,695 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
|
|
Payload
535 - 590 kg
|
Payload
601 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
210 - 520 HP
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
195 km/h
|
|
Torque
470 - 600 Nm
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
154 - 382 kW
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,143 - 2,891 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
|
Brand
Alfa Romeo
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España