VS

Alpine A110 vs Mazda 3 Hatchback comparison

Compare performance (345 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A110 or Mazda 3 Hatchback?

Alpine A110 vs Mazda 3 Hatchback: Key differences

Alpine A110

  • significantly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A110

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 3 Hatchback is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Alpine A110 costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,222 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 3 Hatchback uses 5.6 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

3 Hatchback

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 offers significantly more power – delivering 345 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 159 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A110 delivers substantially more torque with 420 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 180 Nm more.

A110

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda 3 Hatchback offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A110 is noticeably lighter – 1,150 kg compared to 1,417 kg. The difference is around 267 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers significantly more boot space – 351 L compared to 96 L. That’s a difference of about 255 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Hatchback carries significantly more – 502 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 292 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,000
3 Hatchback

Mazda 3 Hatchback

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Alpine A110
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Alpine A110

The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.

details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details
Alpine A110
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption

Price
55,200 - 282,900 £
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
152 - 157 g/km
co2
126 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,150 - 1,194 kg
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
Trunk capacity
96 L
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,798 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
166 - 210 kg
Payload
487 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 345 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 4.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
185 - 254 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.