What drive types are available for the Alpine A110?

The Alpine A110 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Alpine A110?

Depending on the version, the Alpine A110 delivers up to 345 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the Alpine A110 in liters per 100 km?

On average, the Alpine A110 consumes 6.70 L.

What is the Alpine A110’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 96 L fit inside.

What are the Alpine A110’s length, width and height?

Length 4181 mm, width 1798 mm, height 1252 mm – those are the dimensions of the Alpine A110.

What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda 3 Sedan?

Depending on the version, the Mazda 3 Sedan delivers up to 186 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the Mazda 3 Sedan in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.50 L.

How many liters of cargo space does the Mazda 3 Sedan offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 450 L fit inside.

What are the Mazda 3 Sedan’s length, width and height?

The Mazda 3 Sedan measures 4660 mm long, 1795 mm wide and 1440 mm high.

Alpine A110 vs Mazda 3 Sedan – Which car is better? Specs, differences & prices compared

A110 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda 3 Sedan has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25000 £, while the Alpine A110 costs 55200 £. That’s a price difference of around 30265 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda 3 Sedan manages with 5.50 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Alpine A110 with 6.70 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.

A110 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 has a decisively edge – offering 345 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 159 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.10 s. That’s about 4.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alpine A110 performs noticeable better – reaching 285 km/h, while the Mazda 3 Sedan tops out at 216 km/h. The difference is around 69 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A110 pulls clearly stronger with 420 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 180 Nm difference.

A110 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda 3 Sedan offers decisively more seating capacity – 5 vs 2.

In curb weight, Alpine A110 is distinct lighter – 1150 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 270 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers significantly more room – 450 L compared to 96 L. That’s a difference of about 354 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Sedan clearly takes the win – 481 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 271 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda 3 Sedan proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda 3 Sedan is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Alpine A110

The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.

details