VS

Kia XCeed vs Mazda 3 Sedan comparison

Compare performance (180 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia XCeed or Mazda 3 Sedan?

Kia XCeed vs Mazda 3 Sedan: Key differences

Kia XCeed

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • very slightly lighter

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

XCeed

Kia XCeed vs. Mazda 3 Sedan: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, choosing between a compact SUV and a sedan can be a daunting task. In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two compelling contenders: the Kia XCeed and the Mazda 3 Sedan. Both vehicles represent the best of their respective categories, offering unique features, performance capabilities, and cutting-edge technology.

3 Sedan

Design and Dimensions

The Kia XCeed, with its SUV body type, stands out with a robust and stylish design. Measuring 4395 mm in length, 1826 mm in width, and 1495 mm in height, it presents a strong road presence. The XCeed offers a spacious trunk capacity of 426 liters, making it practical for families or adventurers alike.

On the other hand, the Mazda 3 Sedan has a more traditional yet sleek sedan profile. Its dimensions are slightly larger, coming in at 4660 mm long, 1795 mm wide, and 1440 mm high, with a trunk that offers 450 liters of space. The elegant lines and sporty stance of the Mazda 3 exude sophistication, appealing to the driver who values style and aesthetics.

XCeed

Performance and Engine Options

Under the hood, the Kia XCeed offers impressive engine options with both petrol and manual or automatic transmissions available. Its power ranges from 100 HP to a competitive 140 HP, with torque figures of 172 Nm to 253 Nm. The vehicle can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in as little as 10.2 seconds, making it a nimble option for city driving.

The Mazda 3 Sedan takes performance a step further with a petrol MHEV engine, providing up to 186 HP with a torque of 240 Nm. Remarkably, it can sprint from 0-100 km/h in just 8.1 seconds, showcasing its sporty credentials. While its fuel consumption ranges between 5.5 to 6.1 L/100 km, it offers a CO2 efficiency class of D, making it an excellent choice for environmentally conscious drivers.

Transmission and Driving Experience

Each vehicle offers a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. The Kia XCeed offers a smooth driving experience with its Dual-Clutch Automatic gearbox, while the Mazda 3 Sedan’s automatic gearbox is known for its responsiveness and driving engagement. Both vehicles emphasize front-wheel drive configurations, ensuring predictable handling and stability.

Technological Innovations

Technological advancements are crucial in attracting buyers in today's market. The Kia XCeed features an impressive array of connectivity options, including infotainment systems compatible with Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, seamless navigation, and premium audio systems tailored for an elevated driving experience.

Meanwhile, the Mazda 3 Sedan includes advanced safety features such as adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and a comprehensive suite of airbags. Together with its sophisticated infotainment system, which harmonizes seamlessly with the vehicle’s sleek design, it enhances overall driver enjoyment and peace of mind.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency remains a critical factor in modern automotive choices. The Kia XCeed averages between 6.3 and 6.5 L/100 km, alongside CO2 emissions that range from 143 to 148 g/km. Its 50-liter fuel tank capacity ensures respectable range for everyday driving and occasional long trips.

The Mazda 3 Sedan leads the pack in fuel efficiency, boasting numbers as low as 5.5 L/100 km. With CO2 emissions between 123 and 135 g/km, it is a strong contender for those who prioritize sustainability without sacrificing performance. Its 51-liter fuel tank further enhances its usability for longer journeys.

Conclusion: Which One Is Right for You?

Choosing between the Kia XCeed and the Mazda 3 Sedan ultimately depends on individual needs and preferences. If you’re seeking practicality with the versatility of an SUV, the XCeed might be the ideal choice. Conversely, if you desire a sporty driving dynamic coupled with chic design, the Mazda 3 Sedan could be your perfect match.

Both the Kia XCeed and Mazda 3 Sedan are excellent representatives of their segments, each bringing a unique set of skills and innovations to the table. Regardless of your choice, you’re guaranteed a thrilling driving experience that combines style, efficiency, and technological sophistication.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XCeed

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Kia XCeed is barely cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Mazda 3 Sedan costs 25,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,843 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 3 Sedan uses 5.5 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Kia XCeed with 6.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

3 Sedan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers barely more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Kia XCeed takes 8.5 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia XCeed delivers marginally more torque with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

XCeed

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia XCeed is very slightly lighter – 1,351 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 69 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers barely more boot space – 450 L compared to 426 L. That’s a difference of about 24 L.

When it comes to payload, the Kia XCeed carries only slightly more – 485 kg compared to 481 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,000
3 Sedan

Mazda 3 Sedan

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
Kia XCeed
Mazda 3 Sedan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Kia XCeed

Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.

details

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details
Kia XCeed
Mazda 3 Sedan

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,100 - 33,000 £
Price
25,000 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
6.3 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
143 - 155 g/km
co2
123 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,419 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,492 kg
Trunk capacity
426 L
Trunk capacity
450 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,826 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
471 - 485 kg
Payload
467 - 481 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 12.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Kia
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.