VS

Alpine A110 vs Mazda CX-5 comparison

Compare performance (345 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A110 or Mazda CX-5?

Alpine A110 vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences

Alpine A110

  • clearly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter
details

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A110

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-5 is significantly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Alpine A110 costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,251 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Alpine A110 uses 6.7 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

CX-5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A110 offers clearly more power – delivering 345 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 204 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A110 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 6.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A110 delivers substantially more torque with 420 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 182 Nm more.

A110

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-5 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A110 is significantly lighter – 1,150 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 479 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers significantly more boot space – 466 L compared to 96 L. That’s a difference of about 370 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries considerably more – 601 kg compared to 210 kg. That’s a difference of about 391 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A110 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,200
A110

Alpine A110

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 345 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Alpine A110
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Alpine A110

The Alpine A110 is a stunning testament to modern automotive design, seamlessly blending performance with elegance. Its lightweight construction contributes to an exhilarating driving experience, making it a true driver's car. With its distinctive styling and agile handling, the A110 captures the spirit of classic sports cars while embracing contemporary technology.

details

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
Alpine A110
Mazda CX-5

Costs and Consumption

Price
55,200 - 282,900 £
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
152 - 157 g/km
co2
157 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Coupe
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,150 - 1,194 kg
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Trunk capacity
96 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,798 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
166 - 210 kg
Payload
566 - 601 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 345 HP
Power HP
141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 4.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
Torque
238 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
185 - 254 kW
Power kW
104 kW
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.