VS

Alpine A290 vs Audi Q3 comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Audi Q3?

Alpine A290 vs Audi Q3: Key differences

Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
details

Audi Q3

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Alpine A290 is a bit cheaper – starting at 33,200 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,057 £.

As for electric range, the Alpine A290 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 380 km, about 261 km more than the Audi Q3.

Q3

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers moderately more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.4 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Alpine A290 is very slightly lighter – 1,554 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 81 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers visibly more boot space – 488 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 162 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries visibly more – 535 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 139 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A290 comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,200
A290

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 364 - 380 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Audi Q3 and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you value Audi’s upmarket feel and refinement or the T‑Roc’s sharper pricing and practical versatility. This comparison focuses on real-world driving, interior quality, technology and running costs to help you decide which compact …
Alpine A290
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 is a compact premium crossover that blends sharp styling with a well-crafted interior, making it an appealing choice for urban drivers who want a touch of luxury. It delivers a composed ride, intuitive tech features and a practical cabin, so it works well as a comfortable daily driver with an upscale feel.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

4.3 (4 Reviews)
rate
Del
16 Jun 2026, 12:27:22

Very comfortable and very enjoyable to drive, interior very pleasant. Only missing the automatic controls.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
Kia Sportage
VS
Audi Q3 and Kia Sportage go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q3 or the Kia Sportage …
Audi Q3
SEAT Ateca
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 stands out with its refined interior and advanced technology features, offering a luxurious driving experience. In contrast, the SEAT Ateca impresses with its sporty design and excellent value, making it a practical choice for those seeking both …
Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go toe-to-toe as compact electric hatchbacks, each prioritising sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. This comparison looks at performance, range, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which better fits your needs.
Audi Q3
BMW X2
VS
In the bustling compact luxury SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and BMW X2 both offer distinctive charms that cater to different tastes. The Audi Q3 impresses with its refined interior, boasting advanced technology and a smooth ride that leans towards comfort and practicality. On the other hand, the BMW X2 …
Audi Q3
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and VW Tayron deliver a blend of style and performance that appeals to a diverse range of buyers. While the Q3 boasts Audi's signature luxury and advanced technology, the Tayron offers practicality and value without sacrificing modern features. …
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Audi Q3 dresses up compact-SUV practicality in premium polish — plush interior, refined ride and tech that whispers “grown-up” refinement. The CUPRA Terramar, by contrast, prowls with sharper handling, punchier engines and a sporty attitude that’ll make you smile even if the mpg takes a hit, so …
Audi Q3
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Nissan Qashqai both offer compelling features tailored to different consumer preferences. The Q3 impresses with its luxurious interior and advanced technology, providing a premium driving experience, while the Qashqai stands out for its …
Audi Q3
Lexus NX
VS
Audi Q3 and Lexus NX go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Audi Q3 or the Lexus NX is the …
Alpine A290
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
39 - 195 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
505 - 535 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B, F
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Audi
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.