Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs BMW iX – Which model is better for everyday use?
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alpine A290 or BMW iX fits your lifestyle better.
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alpine A290 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the BMW iX costs 71600 £. That’s a price difference of around 38400 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the BMW iX with 17.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh.
As for range, the BMW iX performs clearly better – achieving up to 701 km, about 321 km more than the Alpine A290.
iX
@ BMW Group Press
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW iX has a clearly edge – offering 659 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 441 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW iX is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.80 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW iX performs evident better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 80 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW iX pulls convincingly stronger with 1015 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 715 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is clearly lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2525 kg. The difference is around 1046 kg.
In terms of boot space, the BMW iX offers distinct more room – 500 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 174 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BMW iX performs evident better – up to 1750 L, which is about 644 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, BMW iX a bit takes the win – 575 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.
Who wins the race?
The BMW iX proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BMW iX is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £71,600
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
BMW iX
The BMW iX presents a bold step into the future of electric vehicles, combining eco-friendly performance with luxurious comfort. Its sleek design and state-of-the-art technology offer a driving experience that feels both modern and sophisticated. Inside, high-quality materials and an intuitive interface ensure that driver and passengers alike enjoy an immersive journey.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Alpine A290
BMW iX
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
71600 - 107100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 20.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
600 - 701 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
96 - 109.6 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2525 - 2655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4965 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1970 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1688 - 1695 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1750 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
505 - 575 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
408 - 659 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 5.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
700 - 1015 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
300 - 485 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
BMW
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.