VS

Alpine A290 vs Nissan Micra comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Nissan Micra?

Alpine A290 vs Nissan Micra: Key differences

Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Nissan Micra

  • markedly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Micra is markedly cheaper – starting at 24,000 £ , while the Alpine A290 costs 33,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,180 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Nissan Micra is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.2 kWh/100km compared to 15.8 kWh/100km for the Alpine A290. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Micra offers marginally more range – reaching up to 416 km, about 36 km more than the Alpine A290.

Micra

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 offers noticeably more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Nissan Micra takes 8 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A290 delivers moderately more torque with 300 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Micra is only slightly lighter – 1,452 kg compared to 1,554 kg. The difference is around 102 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Micra carries very slightly more – 408 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A290 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,200
A290

Alpine A290

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 177 - 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 364 - 380 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
Nissan Micra
VS
The cheeky, retro-modern Renault 5 squares up against the urbane, sensible Nissan Micra — two compact contenders fighting for your city keys. We’ll compare style, practicality, driving feel and running costs to find out which is the smarter buy for everyday life.
Hyundai Inster
Nissan Micra
VS
The Hyundai Inster hustles through town with roomy practicality and wallet-friendly running costs, while the Nissan Micra scores points for sharper handling, cheeky styling and a more engaging turbo feel. For no-nonsense commuting pick the Inster; if you crave personality and a bit of fun behind …
Alpine A290
Nissan Micra

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A290

The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.

details
alpinea290

Reviews Alpine A290

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Emin Molu
17 Apr 2026, 21:05:51

excellent handling, excellent damping, excellent noise supression, excellent design.fantastic fun to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Micra

The Nissan Micra is a compact hatchback renowned for its agile handling and city-friendly dimensions. With a design that blends sleek curves with a practical layout, it appeals to urban drivers who value style and efficiency. Inside, the car offers a surprising amount of room and useful tech features, making it both a convenient and comfortable ride for daily commutes.

details
serpimg_LJ8L9f

Reviews Nissan Micra

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A290
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born go toe-to-toe as compact electric hatchbacks, each prioritising sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. This comparison looks at performance, range, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which better fits your needs.
Fiat 600
Nissan Micra
VS
Deciding between the Fiat 600 and the Nissan Micra means choosing between Italian flair and simple, city-friendly packaging versus the Micra’s modern practicality and refinement. This comparison examines size, performance, economy, comfort and running costs so you can pick the small car that fits …
Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
Fiat 500
Nissan Micra
VS
Choosing between the Fiat 500 and the Nissan Micra means weighing Italian flair against practical, value-driven design. The Fiat 500 brings iconic styling and a fun urban drive, while the Nissan Micra emphasizes interior space, fuel efficiency and everyday usability.
BYD Dolphin
Nissan Micra
VS
Comparing the BYD Dolphin and the Nissan Micra helps buyers choose between a modern electric hatchback and a long-standing compact city car. The Dolphin brings EV range, advanced tech and a fresh design, while the Micra offers proven fuel efficiency, low running costs and familiar practicality.
Nissan Micra
Kia EV2
VS
Nissan Micra and Kia EV2 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Nissan Micra
VW ID.Polo
VS
Nissan Micra and VW ID.Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Alpine A290
VW ID.Polo
VS
Alpine A290 and VW ID.Polo go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Alpine A290
Nissan Micra

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
Price
24,000 - 29,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.2 - 14.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
317 - 416 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,554 kg
Curb weight
1,452 - 1,527 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,820 mm
Width
1,774 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
396 kg
Payload
403 - 408 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Nissan
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

The Alpine A290 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.