Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Peugeot Traveller – Which car suits you better?
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alpine A290 or Peugeot Traveller fits your lifestyle better.
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alpine A290 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Peugeot Traveller costs 34800 £. That’s a price difference of around 1654 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s convincingly more efficient than the Peugeot Traveller with 24.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 8.50 kWh.
As for range, the Alpine A290 performs slight better – achieving up to 380 km, about 29 km more than the Peugeot Traveller.
Traveller
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a somewhat edge – offering 218 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Peugeot Traveller takes 10.60 s. That’s about 4.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Peugeot Traveller performs minimal better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot Traveller pulls evident stronger with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Peugeot Traveller offers distinct more seating capacity – 8 vs 5.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1953 kg. The difference is around 474 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Peugeot Traveller offers significantly more room – 2011 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 1685 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot Traveller performs decisively better – up to 3300 L, which is about 2194 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Peugeot Traveller clearly takes the win – 914 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 443 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Peugeot Traveller shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £34,800
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Peugeot Traveller
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Peugeot Traveller
The Traveller captivates with its refined blend of comfort and versatility, making it an ideal choice for both family adventures and professional needs. Its spacious interior accommodates a remarkable range of passenger and cargo configurations, ensuring flexibility for any journey. With an emphasis on safety and modern features, the Traveller delivers a remarkable driving experience that caters to diverse lifestyles.
details
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Alpine A290
Peugeot Traveller
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
34800 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24.3 - 25 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
217 - 351 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 188 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
8
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1953 - 2240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
1624 - 2011 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4983 - 5333 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1920 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1890 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2700 - 3300 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
850 - 914 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 180 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 14.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 185 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
270 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 132 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2184 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.