Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Polestar 2 – Which model is better for everyday use?
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alpine A290 or Polestar 2 fits your lifestyle better.
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Alpine A290 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Polestar 2 costs 42000 £. That’s a price difference of around 8820 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Polestar 2: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1 kWh.
As for range, the Polestar 2 performs clearly better – achieving up to 659 km, about 279 km more than the Alpine A290.
2
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 2 has a significantly edge – offering 476 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 258 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 2 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Polestar 2 performs slightly better – reaching 205 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 35 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 2 pulls convincingly stronger with 740 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 440 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2015 kg. The difference is around 536 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Polestar 2 offers slightly more room – 405 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Alpine A290 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1106 L, which is about 11 L more than the Polestar 2.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 slightly takes the win – 471 kg compared to 421 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Polestar 2 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £42,000
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Polestar 2
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Polestar 2
Der Polestar 2 beeindruckt mit seinem klaren, skandinavischen Design und einer hochwertigen Verarbeitung, die sowohl innen als auch außen zu sehen ist. Besonders auffallend ist das futuristische Cockpit mit einem innovativen Infotainment-System, das auf Android basiert und nahtlose Konnektivität bietet. Zusätzlich bietet das Modell ein exzellentes Fahrgefühl mit dynamischen Fahreigenschaften, das selbst anspruchsvolle Fahrer begeistert.
details
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
Alpine A290
Polestar 2
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
42000 - 57400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
554 - 659 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
78 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
2015 - 2188 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
405 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4606 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1859 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1473 - 1479 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1095 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
375 - 421 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 476 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
205 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
490 - 740 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 350 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Polestar
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.