@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Polestar Automotive Holding
VS

Alpine A290 vs Polestar 3 – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Polestar 3.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Alpine A290 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Polestar 3 costs 67400 £. That’s a price difference of around 34191 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Polestar 3 with 17.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.80 kWh.

As for range, the Polestar 3 performs significantly better – achieving up to 706 km, about 326 km more than the Alpine A290.

3 @ Polestar Automotive Holding

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 3 has a convincingly edge – offering 517 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 299 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 3 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.70 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Polestar 3 performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 3 pulls convincingly stronger with 910 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 610 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is convincingly lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2575 kg. The difference is around 1096 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Polestar 3 offers evident more room – 484 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 158 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Polestar 3 performs noticeable better – up to 1411 L, which is about 305 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Polestar 3 slight takes the win – 496 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Polestar 3 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Polestar 3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £67,400
3 @ Polestar Automotive Holding

Polestar 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 299 - 517 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.6 - 21.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 567 - 706 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Polestar 3

Der Polestar 3 präsentiert sich als eindrucksvolles Elektro-SUV, das skandinavisches Design mit nachhaltiger Technologie vereint. Die klare Linienführung und hochwertigen Materialien im Innenraum schaffen eine luxuriöse Atmosphäre, während das fortschrittliche Infotainmentsystem für modernste Konnektivität sorgt. Mit seinem leistungsstarken Antrieb bietet der Polestar 3 ein dynamisches Fahrerlebnis, das sowohl umweltfreundlich als auch leistungsfähig ist.

details
Alpine A290
Polestar 3
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
3 @ Polestar Automotive Holding

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
67400 - 79000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
17.6 - 21.9 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
567 - 706 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
107 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
2575 - 2584 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
484 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4900 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1935 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1614 - 1618 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1411 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
285 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
299 - 517 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 7.8 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 210 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
490 - 910 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
220 - 380 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Polestar
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.