Compare performance (517 HP vs 575 HP), boot space and price (67400 £ vs 51100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Polestar 3 or XPeng G9?
The electric SUV market continues to heat up with the introduction of two innovative models for 2024: the Polestar 3 and the XPeng G9. Both vehicles promise thrilling performance, cutting-edge technology, and exceptional comfort, making the choice between them a challenge for eco-conscious enthusiasts.
At first glance, the Polestar 3 and XPeng G9 appear as stylish and robust electric SUVs, yet showcasing diverse design philosophies. The Polestar 3 measures 4900 mm in length and stands 1614 mm tall, boasting a modern Scandinavian aesthetic characterized by minimalist lines and a streamlined profile. Its counterpart, the XPeng G9, is just shy at 4891 mm in length but stands slightly taller with a maximal height of 1680 mm, embracing a more dynamic and expressive exterior design.
Performance aficionados will find plenty to admire in both vehicles. The Polestar 3, available with all-wheel and rear-wheel drive options, pumps out between 489 and 517 HP, reaching a torque as high as 910 Nm and achieving a swift 0-100 km/h acceleration in as little as 4.7 seconds. Its top speed peaks at 210 km/h, catering to those who crave spirited driving dynamics.
Meanwhile, the XPeng G9 offers a tempting alternative with a rear-wheel and all-wheel-drive setup, cranking out up to 551 HP with a torque of 717 Nm. It powers from 0-100 km/h in an astonishing 3.9 seconds with a controlled top speed of 200 km/h. The inclusion of advanced reduction gearbox technology ensures both vehicles deliver smooth and responsive driving experiences.
When it comes to electric range, the Polestar 3 leads with an impressive maximum electric range of 650 km, whereas the XPeng G9 offers a thoughtful balance with ranges up to 570 km. Both models prioritize efficiency, with the Polestar 3 consuming between 18.9 to 22.1 kWh/100 km, modestly exceeding the XPeng G9's consumption range of 19.4 to 21.3 kWh/100 km.
Fueling these cars with energy are potent battery packs. The Polestar 3 carries a single variant of a 107 kWh battery, while the XPeng G9 offers flexibility with a choice between 75.8 kWh and 93.1 kWh capacities.
Inside, both models boast roomy, luxurious cabins designed to coddle passengers in comfort. Each SUV accommodates five seats within a tech-laden interior swathed in quality materials. The Polestar 3 offers a trunk capacity of 484 liters, providing ample space for luggage, whereas the XPeng G9 exceeds expectations with a trunk capacity of 660 liters, potentially a decisive factor for families and adventurers alike.
Choosing between the Polestar 3 and the XPeng G9 might hinge on individual priorities. The Polestar 3 impresses with its longer range and Scandinavian appeal, while the XPeng G9 captivates with rapid acceleration and generous storage. As electric mobility continues to advance, both vehicles stand at the forefront, symbolizing the thrilling evolution of SUVs in an electrified era.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
XPeng G9 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 51100 £ , while the Polestar 3 costs 67400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16277 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Polestar 3: with 17.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the XPeng G9 with 18.40 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Polestar 3 performs a bit better – achieving up to 706 km, about 121 km more than the XPeng G9.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G9 has a to a small extent edge – offering 575 HP compared to 517 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G9 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Polestar 3 takes 4.70 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Polestar 3 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 910 Nm compared to 695 Nm. That’s about 215 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, XPeng G9 is a bit lighter – 2210 kg compared to 2575 kg. The difference is around 365 kg.
In terms of boot space, the XPeng G9 offers evident more room – 660 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 176 L.
When it comes to payload, XPeng G9 hardly perceptible takes the win – 520 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
The XPeng G9 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Polestar 3 arrives as a Scandinavian-styled electric SUV that marries minimalist design with a statuesque presence, looking smarter than most in the car park. Inside, the cabin feels airy and thoughtful, with tech and driving manners that lean toward composed comfort rather than outright drama — perfect for buyers who want electric prestige without shouting about it.
details
The XPeng G9 feels like a confident leap into the electric SUV world, with sleek, purposeful styling and an interior that mixes modern tech with everyday comfort. On the road it’s calm and composed, serving up effortless pace and hushed refinement that turns long commutes into something you might actually enjoy — a strong pick for buyers who want electric convenience without compromise.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67400 - 79000 £
|
Price
51100 - 62200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.6 - 21.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
567 - 706 km
|
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
107 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2575 - 2584 kg
|
Curb weight
2210 - 2395 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
484 L
|
Trunk capacity
660 L
|
|
Length
4900 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1935 mm
|
Width
1937 mm
|
|
Height
1614 - 1618 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1411 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
285 - 496 kg
|
Payload
515 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
299 - 517 HP
|
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 7.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
490 - 910 Nm
|
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
220 - 380 kW
|
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Polestar
|
Brand
XPeng
|
The Polestar 3 is available as All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España