Compare performance (680 HP vs 575 HP), boot space and price (67,600 £ vs 51,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Polestar 3 or XPeng G9?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The electric SUV market continues to heat up with the introduction of two innovative models for 2024: the Polestar 3 and the XPeng G9. Both vehicles promise thrilling performance, cutting-edge technology, and exceptional comfort, making the choice between them a challenge for eco-conscious enthusiasts.
At first glance, the Polestar 3 and XPeng G9 appear as stylish and robust electric SUVs, yet showcasing diverse design philosophies. The Polestar 3 measures 4900 mm in length and stands 1614 mm tall, boasting a modern Scandinavian aesthetic characterized by minimalist lines and a streamlined profile. Its counterpart, the XPeng G9, is just shy at 4891 mm in length but stands slightly taller with a maximal height of 1680 mm, embracing a more dynamic and expressive exterior design.
Performance aficionados will find plenty to admire in both vehicles. The Polestar 3, available with all-wheel and rear-wheel drive options, pumps out between 489 and 517 HP, reaching a torque as high as 910 Nm and achieving a swift 0-100 km/h acceleration in as little as 4.7 seconds. Its top speed peaks at 210 km/h, catering to those who crave spirited driving dynamics.
Meanwhile, the XPeng G9 offers a tempting alternative with a rear-wheel and all-wheel-drive setup, cranking out up to 551 HP with a torque of 717 Nm. It powers from 0-100 km/h in an astonishing 3.9 seconds with a controlled top speed of 200 km/h. The inclusion of advanced reduction gearbox technology ensures both vehicles deliver smooth and responsive driving experiences.
When it comes to electric range, the Polestar 3 leads with an impressive maximum electric range of 650 km, whereas the XPeng G9 offers a thoughtful balance with ranges up to 570 km. Both models prioritize efficiency, with the Polestar 3 consuming between 18.9 to 22.1 kWh/100 km, modestly exceeding the XPeng G9's consumption range of 19.4 to 21.3 kWh/100 km.
Fueling these cars with energy are potent battery packs. The Polestar 3 carries a single variant of a 107 kWh battery, while the XPeng G9 offers flexibility with a choice between 75.8 kWh and 93.1 kWh capacities.
Inside, both models boast roomy, luxurious cabins designed to coddle passengers in comfort. Each SUV accommodates five seats within a tech-laden interior swathed in quality materials. The Polestar 3 offers a trunk capacity of 484 liters, providing ample space for luggage, whereas the XPeng G9 exceeds expectations with a trunk capacity of 660 liters, potentially a decisive factor for families and adventurers alike.
Choosing between the Polestar 3 and the XPeng G9 might hinge on individual priorities. The Polestar 3 impresses with its longer range and Scandinavian appeal, while the XPeng G9 captivates with rapid acceleration and generous storage. As electric mobility continues to advance, both vehicles stand at the forefront, symbolizing the thrilling evolution of SUVs in an electrified era.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
XPeng G9 is visibly cheaper – starting at 51,100 £ , while the Polestar 3 costs 67,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,543 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Polestar 3 is marginally more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 18.4 kWh/100km for the XPeng G9. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Polestar 3 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 647 km, about 62 km more than the XPeng G9.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Polestar 3 offers slightly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 575 HP. That’s roughly 105 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Polestar 3 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the XPeng G9 takes 4.2 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Polestar 3 delivers clearly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 695 Nm. That’s about 175 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, XPeng G9 is barely lighter – 2,210 kg compared to 2,315 kg. The difference is around 105 kg.
Looking at boot space, the XPeng G9 offers markedly more boot space – 660 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 176 L.
When it comes to payload, the Polestar 3 carries a bit more – 645 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
The Polestar 3 has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Polestar 3 arrives as a Scandinavian-styled electric SUV that marries minimalist design with a statuesque presence, looking smarter than most in the car park. Inside, the cabin feels airy and thoughtful, with tech and driving manners that lean toward composed comfort rather than outright drama — perfect for buyers who want electric prestige without shouting about it.
details
The XPeng G9 is a spacious, tech-forward electric SUV that pairs a calm, refined ride with responsive performance and a high-quality, minimalist cabin. With strong emphasis on connectivity and advanced driving assistance, it’s a compelling choice if you want modern EV features and generous practicality without a legacy badge.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,600 - 91,600 £
|
Price
51,100 - 62,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 20.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.4 - 20.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
601 - 647 km
|
Electric Range
502 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,315 - 2,525 kg
|
Curb weight
2,210 - 2,395 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
484 L
|
Trunk capacity
660 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,935 mm
|
Width
1,937 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
605 - 645 kg
|
Payload
515 - 520 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
Power HP
351 - 575 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
Torque
465 - 695 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
Power kW
258 - 423 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Polestar
|
Brand
XPeng
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España