Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Skoda Superb Combi – Which one offers the better deal?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Alpine A290 or Skoda Superb Combi?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alpine A290 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Skoda Superb Combi costs 35200 £. That’s a price difference of around 2057 £.
As for range, the Alpine A290 performs convincingly better – achieving up to 380 km, about 246 km more than the Skoda Superb Combi.
Superb Combi
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Superb Combi has a to a small extent edge – offering 265 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Combi is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Superb Combi performs distinct better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 80 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Superb Combi pulls distinct stronger with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is barely noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1575 kg. The difference is around 96 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Superb Combi offers convincingly more room – 690 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 364 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Superb Combi performs decisively better – up to 1920 L, which is about 814 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Superb Combi a bit takes the win – 584 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 113 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Superb Combi proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Superb Combi is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £35,200
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Superb Combi
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Skoda Superb Combi
The Škoda Superb Combi combines practicality and elegance, making it a popular choice for families and professionals alike. Its spacious interior offers exceptional comfort and ample storage, suitable for long journeys and everyday errands. Additionally, the refined design and advanced technology features ensure a sophisticated driving experience.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Alpine A290
Skoda Superb Combi
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
35200 - 51000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
124 - 134 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
8 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 66 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1575 - 1853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4902 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1849 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1482 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1770 - 1920 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
220 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F, D, G
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.