Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs smart #3 – Differences & prices compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or smart #3?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Alpine A290 has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the smart #3 costs 34700 £. That’s a price difference of around 1534 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the smart #3 with 16.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.50 kWh.
As for range, the smart #3 performs slightly better – achieving up to 455 km, about 75 km more than the Alpine A290.
#3
@ smart Europe GmbH
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 has a clearly edge – offering 428 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 210 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the smart #3 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: smart #3 pulls significantly stronger with 584 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 284 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1780 kg. The difference is around 301 kg.
In terms of boot space, the smart #3 offers slightly more room – 370 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.
In maximum load capacity, the smart #3 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1160 L, which is about 54 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Alpine A290 barely noticeable takes the win – 471 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the smart #3 shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £34,700
@ smart Europe GmbH
smart #3
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
smart #3
The Smart #3 represents a bold evolution in urban mobility, merging sleek design with sustainability. This compact electric SUV boasts a modern silhouette and advanced technology features that make city driving both efficient and enjoyable. With its spacious interior and innovative connectivity options, the Smart #3 is poised to redefine the expectations for eco-friendly urban transport.
details
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
Alpine A290
smart #3
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ smart Europe GmbH
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
34700 - 45800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
325 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1780 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4400 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1844 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1556 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1160 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
419 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
smart
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.