Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs smart #3 comparison
Compare performance (218 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (33,200 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or smart #3?
Alpine A290 vs smart #3: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Alpine A290 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 33,200 £ , while the smart #3 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,820 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Alpine A290 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 15.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.3 kWh/100km for the smart #3. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the smart #3 offers a bit more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 75 km more than the Alpine A290.
#3
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers moderately more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the smart #3 is only slightly faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #3 delivers clearly more torque with 384 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 84 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Alpine A290 is moderately lighter – 1,554 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 256 kg.
Looking at boot space, the smart #3 offers slightly more boot space – 370 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.
For maximum load capacity, the smart #3 offers very slightly more capacity – up to 1,160 L, about 54 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, the smart #3 carries moderately more – 450 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The smart #3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
£41,991
smart #3
Alpine A290
smart #3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
smart #3
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
Alpine A290
smart #3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,200 - 39,600 £
|
Price
42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
62 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,554 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
3,990 mm
|
Length
4,400 mm
|
|
Width
1,820 mm
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
|
Height
1,520 mm
|
Height
1,556 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,160 L
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
384 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
smart
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.