Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs smart #3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (33200 £ vs 34700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or smart #3?
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Alpine A290 has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £ , while the smart #3 costs 34700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1534 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the smart #3 with 16.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the smart #3 performs slightly better – achieving up to 455 km, about 75 km more than the Alpine A290.
#3
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 has a clearly edge – offering 428 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 210 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the smart #3 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: smart #3 pulls significantly stronger with 584 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 284 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is to a small extent lighter – 1554 kg compared to 1780 kg. The difference is around 226 kg.
In terms of boot space, the smart #3 offers slightly more room – 370 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.
In maximum load capacity, the smart #3 performs barely noticeable better – up to 1160 L, which is about 54 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, smart #3 a bit takes the win – 450 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the smart #3 shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £34,700
smart #3
Alpine A290
smart #3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Alpine A290
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
smart #3
5 (1 Reviews)
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
Alpine A290
smart #3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
34700 - 45800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
325 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1554 kg
|
Curb weight
1780 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
3990 mm
|
Length
4400 mm
|
|
Width
1820 mm
|
Width
1844 mm
|
|
Height
1520 mm
|
Height
1556 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1160 L
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
419 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
smart
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.