@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
VS

Alpine A290 vs Toyota bZ4X – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Two cars, one duel: Alpine A290 meets Toyota bZ4X.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Alpine A290 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Toyota bZ4X costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 3600 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Toyota bZ4X: with 13.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.30 kWh.

As for range, the Toyota bZ4X performs distinct better – achieving up to 568 km, about 188 km more than the Alpine A290.

bZ4X @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota bZ4X has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 343 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 125 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota bZ4X is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.10 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Alpine A290 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 170 km/h, while the Toyota bZ4X tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota bZ4X pulls to a small extent stronger with 338 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 38 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is distinct lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1970 kg. The difference is around 491 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Toyota bZ4X offers distinct more room – 452 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 126 L.

When it comes to payload, Toyota bZ4X hardly perceptible takes the win – 495 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Toyota bZ4X proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Toyota bZ4X is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £36,800
bZ4X @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota bZ4X

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.5 - 16.2 kWh
  • Electric Range : 444 - 568 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Toyota bZ4X

The Toyota bZ4X represents a bold step forward in the brand's commitment to electric mobility, showcasing an innovative design that merges futuristic aesthetics and functionality. Inside, the spacious cabin is thoughtfully crafted to provide comfort and advanced technology, ensuring a pleasurable driving experience. With its impressive range and sustainable vision, the bZ4X sets a new benchmark for environmentally conscious driving without compromising on performance or style.

details
Alpine A290
Toyota bZ4X
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
bZ4X @ Toyota Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
36800 - 48000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
13.5 - 16.2 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
444 - 568 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1970 - 2180 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4690 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1860 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1600 - 1650 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
471 kg
Payload
375 - 495 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.1 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
140 - 160 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
265 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Toyota
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.