@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
VS

Alpine A290 vs Volvo ES90 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Volvo ES90?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Volvo ES90 costs 61700 £. That’s a price difference of around 28534 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Alpine A290: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Volvo ES90 with 15.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.10 kWh.

As for range, the Volvo ES90 performs decisively better – achieving up to 700 km, about 320 km more than the Alpine A290.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 has a convincingly edge – offering 680 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 462 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo ES90 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo ES90 pulls significantly stronger with 870 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 570 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is convincingly lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2410 kg. The difference is around 931 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo ES90 offers noticeable more room – 424 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 98 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo ES90 performs evident better – up to 1427 L, which is about 321 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Volvo ES90 barely noticeable takes the win – 500 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo ES90 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £61,700
default

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 - 17.1 kWh
  • Electric Range : 651 - 700 km

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details

Volvo ES90

3.5 (2)
rate

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
Alpine A290
Volvo ES90
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
61700 - 81000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.1 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
651 - 700 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
2410 - 2610 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
424 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
5000 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1942 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1546 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1427 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
490 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Volvo
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.