@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Alpine A290 vs Volvo XC60 – Differences & prices compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Volvo XC60?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Volvo XC60 costs 49200 £. That’s a price difference of around 16020 £.

As for range, the Alpine A290 performs significantly better – achieving up to 380 km, about 298 km more than the Volvo XC60.

XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 has a significantly edge – offering 455 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 237 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC60 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC60 pulls clearly stronger with 709 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 409 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is noticeable lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1900 kg. The difference is around 421 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers evident more room – 483 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 157 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 performs evident better – up to 1543 L, which is about 437 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC60 a bit takes the win – 550 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Volvo XC60 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £49,200
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details
alpinea290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Volvo XC60

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC60 strikes a perfect balance between contemporary design and practical functionality, making it an appealing choice for those in search of a reliable and stylish SUV. Its interior showcases a blend of high-quality materials and innovative technology, ensuring a comfortable and seamless driving experience. With its emphasis on safety and environmental sustainability, the XC60 continues to stand out in the competitive SUV market.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey @ Volvo Cars
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior @ Volvo Cars
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 and Volvo XC60 each bring their unique strengths to the table. The RAV4 excels with its reliability and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for families who prioritize practicality. In contrast, the XC60 offers a luxurious …
Alpine A290
Volvo XC60
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
XC60 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
49200 - 75100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
1900 - 2150 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4708 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1902 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1651 - 1655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1528 - 1543 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tiguan
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC60 and VW Tiguan stand out with their unique offerings. The XC60 boasts cutting-edge safety features and a luxurious interior, making it a favorite for those prioritizing comfort and security. Meanwhile, the Tiguan impresses with its spaciousness …
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
BYD Seal U
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the BYD Seal U and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles showcase impressive features tailored to different driving preferences. The BYD Seal U offers an attractive blend of cutting-edge electric technology and spacious interior, making it ideal for eco-conscious …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the head-to-head comparison of the Volvo XC60 and Lynk & Co 08, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table. The Volvo XC60 stands out with its time-tested reputation for safety and luxury, offering a refined driving experience and robust build quality. On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 08, …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V60
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a …
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
In the exciting showdown between the Alpine A290 and the iconic Renault R5, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating blend of modern engineering and classic charm. The A290 boasts cutting-edge performance and advanced technology, while the R5 captivates with its nostalgic allure and timeless …
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes GLC
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, …
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.