Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs VW Tayron – Which model is better for everyday use?
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or VW Tayron?
A290
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Alpine A290 has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the VW Tayron costs 39000 £. That’s a price difference of around 5807 £.
As for range, the Alpine A290 performs convincingly better – achieving up to 380 km, about 254 km more than the VW Tayron.
Tayron
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Tayron has a a bit edge – offering 272 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Tayron is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 6.10 s, while the Alpine A290 takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the VW Tayron performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 240 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 70 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: VW Tayron pulls evident stronger with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Alpine A290 is to a small extent lighter – 1479 kg compared to 1682 kg. The difference is around 203 kg.
In terms of boot space, the VW Tayron offers convincingly more room – 885 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 559 L.
In maximum load capacity, the VW Tayron performs decisively better – up to 2090 L, which is about 984 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, VW Tayron to a small extent takes the win – 566 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the VW Tayron shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £39,000
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
Alpine A290
The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.
details
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
VW Tayron
The Tayron stands out as a stylish and versatile SUV that expertly blends form and function. With its spacious interior and modern design, it caters to families and adventure seekers alike, making every journey enjoyable. Equipped with advanced technology and safety features, the Tayron promises a driving experience that is both secure and exhilarating.
details
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
Alpine A290
VW Tayron
|
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
|
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
39000 - 52600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
117 - 126 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
9 - 192 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1479 kg
|
Curb weight
1682 - 1948 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
705 - 885 L
|
|
Length
3997 mm
|
Length
4792 mm
|
|
Width
1823 mm
|
Width
1853 - 1866 mm
|
|
Height
1512 mm
|
Height
1666 - 1668 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1915 - 2090 L
|
|
Payload
471 kg
|
Payload
489 - 566 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
204 - 240 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B, F, G
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
VW
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.