Compare performance (470 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (57,900 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A390 or Ford Transit Transporter?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Alpine A390 is a bit cheaper – starting at 57,900 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,452 £.
As for electric range, the Alpine A390 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 551 km, about 149 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 offers clearly more power – delivering 470 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 201 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A390 delivers substantially more torque with 824 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 394 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Alpine A390 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
57,900 - 66,900 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
497 - 551 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,121 - 2,124 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
532 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,885 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
481 - 484 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Ford
|