Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi A3 Sportback vs Renault Kangoo comparison
Compare performance (400 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A3 Sportback or Renault Kangoo?
A3 Sportback
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Kangoo is marginally cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Audi A3 Sportback costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,286 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Kangoo with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 4.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo offers considerably more range – reaching up to 285 km, about 144 km more than the Audi A3 Sportback.
Kangoo
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers considerably more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 270 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Renault Kangoo takes 11.6 s. That’s about 7.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Audi A3 Sportback is substantially faster – reaching 237 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 102 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers clearly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm more.
A3 Sportback
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is only slightly lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 1,489 kg. The difference is around 129 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers clearly more boot space – 950 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 570 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo offers significantly more capacity – up to 3,050 L, about 1,950 L more than the Audi A3 Sportback.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo carries clearly more – 610 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 130 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A3 Sportback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi A3 Sportback
Renault Kangoo
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A3 Sportback
The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
details
Renault Kangoo
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
details
Audi A3 Sportback
Renault Kangoo
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 56,600 £
|
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
|
Length
4,352 - 4,353 mm
|
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
|
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
|
|
Height
1,441 - 1,470 mm
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
|
|
Payload
410 - 480 kg
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
225 - 237 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.