Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi A6 Avant vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (367 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (49700 £ vs 43300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 Avant or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
A6 Avant
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 43300 £ , while the Audi A6 Avant costs 49700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6429 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi A6 Avant manages with 2.30 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 1.40 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Audi A6 Avant performs decisively better – achieving up to 101 km, about 41 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 Avant has a noticeable edge – offering 367 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 98 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 Avant is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.70 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi A6 Avant performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 37 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi A6 Avant pulls slight stronger with 550 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
A6 Avant
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is hardly perceptible lighter – 1792 kg compared to 1865 kg. The difference is around 73 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi A6 Avant offers slight more room – 503 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 31 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Audi A6 Avant performs distinct better – up to 1534 L, which is about 378 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque barely noticeable takes the win – 600 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Audi A6 Avant proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi A6 Avant is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £49,700
Audi A6 Avant
Audi A6 Avant
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A6 Avant
The Audi A6 Avant wraps executive poise and usable practicality into an impeccably finished estate that makes everyday driving feel noticeably more grown-up. It serves up a calm, composed ride and clever packaging for buyers who want space and refinement without ostentation — the sensible choice that still manages to impress.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Audi A6 Avant
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49700 - 70200 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 7.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
94 - 101 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
53 - 170 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 60 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1865 - 2240 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
404 - 503 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4999 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1875 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1472 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1497 - 1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
535 - 570 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 367 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
238 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
340 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 270 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1968 - 2995 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Audi A6 Avant offered with different drivetrains?
The Audi A6 Avant is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.