Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs SsangYong Torres comparison
Compare performance (551 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 33,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Avant or SsangYong Torres?
Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs SsangYong Torres: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A6 e-tron Avant
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
SsangYong Torres is considerably cheaper – starting at 33,800 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Avant costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,394 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is markedly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the SsangYong Torres. That’s a difference of about 3.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers clearly more range – reaching up to 716 km, about 254 km more than the SsangYong Torres.
Torres
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers clearly more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 344 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is moderately faster – reaching 240 km/h, while the SsangYong Torres tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 46 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Avant delivers considerably more torque with 855 Nm compared to 339 Nm. That’s about 516 Nm more.
A6 e-tron Avant
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Torres is clearly lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 2,185 kg. The difference is around 687 kg.
Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Torres offers visibly more boot space – 703 L compared to 502 L. That’s a difference of about 201 L.
For maximum load capacity, the SsangYong Torres offers slightly more capacity – up to 1,662 L, about 240 L more than the Audi A6 e-tron Avant.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Torres carries marginally more – 552 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 52 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £55,200
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
SsangYong Torres
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant wraps Audi's trademark refinement into a sleek electric estate that looks at home in the city or on the open road. Inside it's grown-up and tech-forward with practical packaging for family life, delivering a composed, confident drive that makes everyday hauling feel a bit more special and slightly futuristic.
details
SsangYong Torres
SsangYong Torres cuts a rugged, purposeful silhouette that feels more expensive than its price tag, offering generously practical packaging and a no-nonsense feature set. It drives with surprisingly assured manners and genuine off-road appetite, making it a clever choice for buyers who want real SUV capability without badge snobbery.
details
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
SsangYong Torres
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
55,200 - 100,100 £
|
Price
33,800 - 44,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
539 - 716 km
|
Electric Range
462 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 207 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,185 - 2,410 kg
|
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,618 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
502 L
|
Trunk capacity
703 L
|
|
Length
4,928 mm
|
Length
4,700 mm
|
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
1,504 - 1,527 mm
|
Height
1,710 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,662 L
|
|
Payload
470 - 500 kg
|
Payload
552 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 207 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
191 - 194 km/h
|
|
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 339 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 152 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
SsangYong
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.