Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs MINI Aceman comparison
Compare performance (551 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (53,800 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Sportback or MINI Aceman?
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback vs MINI Aceman: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
A6 e-tron Sportback
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback costs 53,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,828 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is very slightly more efficient: consuming 13.7 kWh/100km compared to 14.1 kWh/100km for the MINI Aceman. That’s a difference of about 0.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers substantially more range – reaching up to 754 km, about 399 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers substantially more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 293 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback delivers clearly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 505 Nm more.
A6 e-tron Sportback
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is markedly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,175 kg. The difference is around 455 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi A6 e-tron Sportback offers significantly more boot space – 502 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 202 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries marginally more – 530 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £53,800
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
The Audi A6 e-tron Sportback wraps futuristic electric technology in elegant, coupe-like proportions, so you arrive looking sharp without shouting for attention. Inside, refined materials and a calm, driver-focused layout make it a convincing choice for buyers who want quiet, effortless performance with a dash of everyday practicality — the kind of car that raises eyebrows without saying a word.
details
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Audi A6 e-tron Sportback
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
53,800 - 98,700 £
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 16.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
572 - 754 km
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,175 - 2,400 kg
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
502 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
4,928 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
|
Height
1,465 - 1,487 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,330 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
470 - 500 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
MINI
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.