VS

Audi A7 vs Skoda Octavia Combi comparison

Compare performance (630 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (55,000 £ vs 25,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A7 or Skoda Octavia Combi?

Audi A7 vs Skoda Octavia Combi: Key differences

Audi A7

  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Octavia Combi

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A7

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Octavia Combi is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Audi A7 costs 55,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,451 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A7 uses 1.2 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.

Octavia Combi

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi A7 offers clearly more power – delivering 630 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 426 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A7 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.4 s, while the Skoda Octavia Combi takes 6.7 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A7 delivers clearly more torque with 850 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 490 Nm more.

A7

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Skoda Octavia Combi offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is noticeably lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 1,770 kg. The difference is around 404 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers slightly more boot space – 640 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 105 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi A7 carries moderately more – 600 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi A7 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,000
A7

Audi A7

  • Engine Type : Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 630 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.2 - 12.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 67 - 68 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Octavia Combi
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Skoda Octavia Combi and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are two of the most practical estate cars on the market, each promising roomy cabins and sensible running costs for families and commuters. This comparison focuses on cargo space, fuel efficiency, driving dynamics and overall value to …
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Golf Variant
VS
If your shopping list includes a boot that can swallow flat-pack furniture and weekend sports equipment without complaint, the Skoda Octavia Estate is the sensible giant with massive practicality and smart value, while the VW Golf Estate packages similar underpinnings into a neater, more refined …
Audi A7
Skoda Octavia Combi

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi A7

The Audi A7 wraps elegant fastback lines around a sumptuous, tech-packed cabin that turns everyday drives into something a bit more special. It strikes a polished balance between relaxed comfort and engaging poise, so you’ll enjoy long cruises and spirited backroad runs while arriving in unmistakable style.

details
A181361_overfull
A181377_overfull
A1713442_overfull
A181394_overfull
A1713445_overfull

Reviews Audi A7

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Octavia Combi

The Skoda Octavia Combi is a practical, well‑packaged estate that delivers generous and flexible interior space ideal for families or active owners. Its sensible cabin layout, comfortable ride and solid reputation for reliability make it a pragmatic choice for buyers who value utility over flash.

details
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116407
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116406
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_Dynamisch_116402
SKODA_OCTAVIA_COMBI_e_TEC_116372

Reviews Skoda Octavia Combi

3.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
Andrzej
12 May 2026, 15:17:48

Great car with a dynamic 1.5 engine and a 7-speed automatic; a downside is the electronics, which often shut off—terrible when reversing!!! It could also have a bigger tank because it averages 7 liters and at most 700 km.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Passat
VS
Comparing the Skoda Octavia Estate and the Volkswagen Passat is a classic choice between maximum practicality and a more polished driving experience. The Octavia Estate typically wins on cargo space and value-for-money, while the Passat leans toward a quieter, more premium cabin and composed …
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
Family-hauling face-off: the Kia Ceed Sportswagon serves big spec, a sweet drive and a long warranty for hatchback money, while the Skoda Octavia Estate counters with limo-like rear legroom, a cavernous boot and a more polished ride. If you prize value and low running costs, pick the Kia; if space, …
BMW 3 Series Touring
Skoda Octavia Combi
VS
The BMW 3 Series Touring and the Skoda Octavia Estate are both practical estate cars, but they target very different buyers: the 3 Series Touring delivers sharper handling, a premium interior and stronger brand cachet, while the Octavia Estate prioritises interior space, low running costs and sheer …
Audi A6 Limousine
Audi A7
VS
Choosing between the Audi A6 and Audi A7 means weighing a traditional executive saloon against a sleeker fastback that shares much of the same engineering. The A6 delivers classic, practical elegance, while the A7 trades a bit of rear-seat practicality for a sportier silhouette and more distinctive …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Skoda Octavia Limousine
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Octavia Estate and the Skoda Octavia Sedan largely comes down to whether you prioritise cargo space and practicality or a cleaner, more traditional booted silhouette. Mechanically they’re very similar — same engines, tech and driving character — but the Estate delivers …
Skoda Octavia Combi
VW Touran
VS
Family-hauling face-off: the Skoda Octavia Combi brings sleek looks, a big boot and crisp road manners, while the VW Touran counters with seven seats, sliding practicality and that boxy charm only an MPV can wear proudly. If you crave car-like drive and great value, go Octavia; if school runs and …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Toyota Corolla
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Octavia Combi and the Toyota Corolla is essentially a choice between roomy, practical estate capability and compact, dependable efficiency. Below I’ll outline where each car excels and which type of buyer will get the most from it.
Skoda Octavia Combi
Kia K4
VS
The Skoda Octavia Combi and Kia K4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Audi A7
Skoda Octavia Combi

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,000 - 117,900 £
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 12.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
67 - 68 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
14.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
28 - 276 g/km
co2
113 - 157 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
52 - 73 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Estate
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,770 - 2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
Trunk capacity
380 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
640 L
Length
4,969 - 5,009 mm
Length
-
Width
1,908 - 1,950 mm
Width
1,829 mm
Height
1,422 - 1,424 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,235 - 1,390 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 - 600 kg
Payload
502 - 534 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 630 HP
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
Max Speed
245 - 280 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
370 - 850 Nm
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 463 kW
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,968 - 3,996 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
Brand
Audi
Brand
Skoda
Is the Audi A7 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.