Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BMW 3 Series Touring vs Skoda Octavia Combi – Which car suits you better?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: BMW 3 Series Touring or Skoda Octavia Combi?
3 Series Touring
@ BMW Group Press
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Octavia Combi has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24400 £, while the BMW 3 Series Touring costs 41100 £. That’s a price difference of around 16637 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: BMW 3 Series Touring manages with 2.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.40 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.
Octavia Combi
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW 3 Series Touring has a significantly edge – offering 550 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 285 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW 3 Series Touring is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Skoda Octavia Combi takes 6.50 s. That’s about 3 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the BMW 3 Series Touring performs somewhat better – reaching 300 km/h, while the Skoda Octavia Combi tops out at 250 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BMW 3 Series Touring pulls clearly stronger with 700 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 330 Nm difference.
3 Series Touring
@ BMW Group Press
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is evident lighter – 1366 kg compared to 1650 kg. The difference is around 284 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers clearly perceptible more room – 640 L compared to 500 L. That’s a difference of about 140 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs slightly better – up to 1700 L, which is about 190 L more than the BMW 3 Series Touring.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Octavia Combi barely noticeable takes the win – 534 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.
Who wins the race?
The BMW 3 Series Touring proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
BMW 3 Series Touring is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £41,100
@ BMW Group Press
BMW 3 Series Touring
BMW 3 Series Touring
The BMW 3 Series Touring blends sporting poise with everyday practicality, wrapping sharp handling and a premium cabin into a wagon that actually makes errands feel enjoyable. It’s the kind of car that hides a family-hauler’s sense of duty beneath a driver's-car attitude — useful, classy, and just cheeky enough to make you smile on the open road.
details
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
@ BMW Group Press
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is the sensible family wagon that somehow turns grocery runs and long trips into a pleasant, unshowy experience — spacious, practical and built like it prefers reliability over flash. With smart touches, clever storage and a cabin that feels grown-up rather than frugal, it’s an easy recommendation for buyers who want maximum utility without sacrificing comfort or style.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
BMW 3 Series Touring
Skoda Octavia Combi
|
@ BMW Group Press
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41100 - 131100 £
|
Price
24400 - 42300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 10.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
91 - 97 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.50 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
57 - 238 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 59 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1650 - 2025 kg
|
Curb weight
1366 - 1553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
410 - 500 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
4713 - 4801 mm
|
Length
4698 - 4709 mm
|
|
Width
1827 - 1918 mm
|
Width
1829 mm
|
|
Height
1440 - 1448 mm
|
Height
1455 - 1468 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1420 - 1510 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1700 L
|
|
Payload
405 - 520 kg
|
Payload
471 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 550 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 8.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
213 - 300 km/h
|
Max Speed
203 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 700 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 405 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1995 - 2998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the BMW 3 Series Touring offered with different drivetrains?
The BMW 3 Series Touring is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.