Compare performance (300 HP vs 131 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 29,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Honda HR-V?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV segment has gained significant traction among car buyers in recent years, thanks to its blend of style, utility, and comfort. Today, we will compare two popular models: the Audi Q2 and the Honda HR-V. Each vehicle brings unique advantages and innovations to the table, appealing to different tastes and preferences.
The Audi Q2 stands out with its sleek, modern aesthetics and a compact profile measuring 4208 mm in length, 1794 mm in width, and 1508 mm in height. A choice of 5 different exterior colors adds to its contemporary flair. On the other hand, the Honda HR-V, which measures 4340 mm in length, 1794 mm in width, and 1582 mm in height, exudes a sporty charm. Its larger stature translates into a slightly higher profile, yet both vehicles comfortably accommodate five passengers.
The Audi Q2 offers a versatile range of powertrain options, including petrol and diesel engines. With power outputs ranging from 116 HP to an astonishing 300 HP, prospective buyers can choose from 3- and 4-cylinder configurations. In contrast, the Honda HR-V is equipped with a full hybrid powertrain delivering 130 HP, focusing on efficiency and eco-friendliness.
When it comes to transmission, the Q2 offers manual and dual-clutch automatic options, enhancing the driving experience. The model can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 4.9 seconds for the high-performance variant. Meanwhile, the Honda HR-V, with its continuously variable transmission (CVT), achieves a 0-100 km/h time of around 10.6 seconds, prioritizing smoothness over raw speed.
In terms of efficiency, the Audi Q2 delivers a range of fuel consumption figures, with the most economical version consuming just 4.8 L/100 km. Comparatively, the HR-V claims an impressive fuel consumption of 5.4 L/100 km. This makes Audi’s offering slightly better in terms of fuel efficiency, though both models exhibit commendable figures for their respective engine types.
The Q2 offers higher performance metrics, with a maximum speed reaching up to 250 km/h and torque ratings going up to 400 Nm, tailored for those who enjoy a sportier drive. In contrast, the Honda HR-V tops out at 170 km/h with a torque of 253 Nm, appealing to those who prefer leisurely drives with effective city maneuverability.
Inside, the Audi Q2 features a high-quality finish, advanced infotainment systems, and ample cargo space of 405 liters, making it practical for everyday use. The HR-V, while not as plush, emphasizes versatility with innovative interior space and flexible seating arrangements. However, it offers slightly less trunk capacity, at 335 liters.
Both models are equipped with the latest tech features. The Q2 boasts Audi’s Virtual Cockpit and MMI infotainment systems, delivering a cutting-edge user experience. The HR-V embodies Honda's commitment to safety and connectivity, featuring an array of Honda Sensing technologies as standard.
Price-wise, the Audi Q2 is positioned as a premium offering, reflecting its luxury branding and advanced features. Conversely, the Honda HR-V comes with a more budget-friendly price tag while still offering reliability and decent performance, making it an attractive option for value-conscious buyers.
Ultimately, the choice between the Audi Q2 and the Honda HR-V will depend on individual preferences and requirements. If you seek a premium SUV experience with powerful performance, the Q2 stands out as an excellent choice. Conversely, if you prioritize efficiency, practicality, and affordability, the HR-V makes a compelling argument. Both vehicles hold a solid place in the compact SUV segment, catering to different drivers' needs.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Audi Q2 is a bit cheaper – starting at 24,900 £ , while the Honda HR-V costs 29,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,885 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q2 uses 4.8 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Honda HR-V with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers considerably more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 169 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Honda HR-V takes 10.6 s. That’s about 5.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q2 delivers visibly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 147 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi Q2 is only slightly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,452 kg. The difference is around 122 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q2 offers visibly more boot space – 405 L compared to 319 L. That’s a difference of about 86 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q2 carries a bit more – 510 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 92 kg.
The Audi Q2 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.
details
The Honda HR-V is the sensible compact crossover that blends roomy practicality with a composed, friendly drive, making it an easy pick for buyers who want everyday usability without fuss. It won’t thrill hardcore enthusiasts, but its clever packaging, comfortable cabin and low-key styling make life simpler — and that’s exactly the point.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
|
Price
29,700 - 35,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
127 - 183 g/km
|
co2
122 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
|
Curb weight
1,452 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
319 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
|
Width
-
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 510 kg
|
Payload
418 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
|
Power HP
131 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
|
Power kW
96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Honda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España