In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and Honda HR-V stand out with their unique strengths. The Q2 impresses with its upscale interior and agile handling, drawing drivers who prioritize luxury and performance. Meanwhile, the HR-V offers a more spacious interior and versatile cargo options, making it an excellent choice for families seeking practicality without sacrificing style.
The compact SUV segment has gained significant traction among car buyers in recent years, thanks to its blend of style, utility, and comfort. Today, we will compare two popular models: the Audi Q2 and the Honda HR-V. Each vehicle brings unique advantages and innovations to the table, appealing to different tastes and preferences.
The Audi Q2 stands out with its sleek, modern aesthetics and a compact profile measuring 4208 mm in length, 1794 mm in width, and 1508 mm in height. A choice of 5 different exterior colors adds to its contemporary flair. On the other hand, the Honda HR-V, which measures 4340 mm in length, 1794 mm in width, and 1582 mm in height, exudes a sporty charm. Its larger stature translates into a slightly higher profile, yet both vehicles comfortably accommodate five passengers.
The Audi Q2 offers a versatile range of powertrain options, including petrol and diesel engines. With power outputs ranging from 116 HP to an astonishing 300 HP, prospective buyers can choose from 3- and 4-cylinder configurations. In contrast, the Honda HR-V is equipped with a full hybrid powertrain delivering 130 HP, focusing on efficiency and eco-friendliness.
When it comes to transmission, the Q2 offers manual and dual-clutch automatic options, enhancing the driving experience. The model can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 4.9 seconds for the high-performance variant. Meanwhile, the Honda HR-V, with its continuously variable transmission (CVT), achieves a 0-100 km/h time of around 10.6 seconds, prioritizing smoothness over raw speed.
In terms of efficiency, the Audi Q2 delivers a range of fuel consumption figures, with the most economical version consuming just 4.8 L/100 km. Comparatively, the HR-V claims an impressive fuel consumption of 5.4 L/100 km. This makes Audi’s offering slightly better in terms of fuel efficiency, though both models exhibit commendable figures for their respective engine types.
The Q2 offers higher performance metrics, with a maximum speed reaching up to 250 km/h and torque ratings going up to 400 Nm, tailored for those who enjoy a sportier drive. In contrast, the Honda HR-V tops out at 170 km/h with a torque of 253 Nm, appealing to those who prefer leisurely drives with effective city maneuverability.
Inside, the Audi Q2 features a high-quality finish, advanced infotainment systems, and ample cargo space of 405 liters, making it practical for everyday use. The HR-V, while not as plush, emphasizes versatility with innovative interior space and flexible seating arrangements. However, it offers slightly less trunk capacity, at 335 liters.
Both models are equipped with the latest tech features. The Q2 boasts Audi’s Virtual Cockpit and MMI infotainment systems, delivering a cutting-edge user experience. The HR-V embodies Honda's commitment to safety and connectivity, featuring an array of Honda Sensing technologies as standard.
Price-wise, the Audi Q2 is positioned as a premium offering, reflecting its luxury branding and advanced features. Conversely, the Honda HR-V comes with a more budget-friendly price tag while still offering reliability and decent performance, making it an attractive option for value-conscious buyers.
Ultimately, the choice between the Audi Q2 and the Honda HR-V will depend on individual preferences and requirements. If you seek a premium SUV experience with powerful performance, the Q2 stands out as an excellent choice. Conversely, if you prioritize efficiency, practicality, and affordability, the HR-V makes a compelling argument. Both vehicles hold a solid place in the compact SUV segment, catering to different drivers' needs.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24500 - 43300
£
|
Price
about 29500 - 33700
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
127 - 190
g/km
|
co2
122
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1330 - 1610
kg
|
Curb weight
1452
kg
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 405
L
|
Trunk capacity
320 - 335
L
|
Length
4208 - 4216
mm
|
Length
4340
mm
|
Width
1794 - 1802
mm
|
Width
-
|
Height
1495 - 1508
mm
|
Height
1582
mm
|
Payload
450 - 510
kg
|
Payload
418
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
116 - 300
HP
|
Power HP
130
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 10.7
s
|
Max Speed
197 - 250
km/h
|
Max Speed
170
km/h
|
Torque
200 - 400
Nm
|
Torque
253
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
85 - 221
kW
|
Power kW
96
kW
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498
cm3
|
Top speed
197 - 250
km/h
|
Top speed
170
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2022
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Honda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.