Compare performance (300 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Nissan Juke?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the dynamic segment of small crossovers, two models capture the limelight: the Audi Q2 and the Nissan Juke. Both bringing their distinct flavors to the table, here’s a detailed comparison of these two popular models, examining their technical prowess and innovative features.
The Audi Q2 offers flexibility with its choice of petrol and diesel engines, alongside options for manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions. The power spectrum is impressive, ranging from 116 HP up to an exhilarating 300 HP. This ensures a fast-paced performance with 0-100 km/h acceleration ranging from 10.5 seconds in base models to a thrilling 4.9 seconds in the top tier. Top speeds are equally varied, from a practical 197 km/h to a remarkable 250 km/h.
The Nissan Juke keeps its lineup concise with petrol engines and a full hybrid option. Output ranges between 114 HP and 143 HP, aiming for fuel efficiency rather than raw power. Its acceleration varies modestly between 10.1 and 11.8 seconds for a 0-100 km/h sprint, with maximum speeds set between 166 and 180 km/h depending on the configuration.
The Audi Q2 demonstrates varied fuel consumption figures, starting at a frugal 4.8 L/100 km and reaching up to 8.4 L/100 km, depending on the engine choice. The CO2 emissions range from 127 g/km to 190 g/km across different models, fitting into efficiency classes ranging from D to G.
The Nissan Juke stands out with its hybrid variant's strikingly low fuel consumption of 4.7 L/100 km, while the petrol variants hover between 5.8 and 6 L/100 km. It boasts lower emissions, slotting into efficiency classes C through E, reflecting its focus on ecology and economy.
In terms of dimensions, the Audi Q2 measures between 4208 mm and 4216 mm in length, 1794 mm to 1802 mm in width, and has a height of approximately 1508 mm. Its trunk can accommodate between 355 to 405 liters, providing ample space for weekend getaways.
The Nissan Juke presents slightly larger proportions with a consistent length of 4210 mm, a width of 1800 mm, and a more elevated height at 1593 mm. It offers a trunk capacity of 422 liters, striking a favorable balance between urban agility and load space.
Both the Audi Q2 and Nissan Juke integrate modern technological features to enhance driving experiences. Audi offers its acclaimed virtual cockpit and MMI infotainment systems, ensuring connectivity and driver-focused technology. Advanced safety features and a Quattro drive option underline its high-tech innovations.
The Nissan Juke delivers with an innovative infotainment system compatible with smartphone connectivity, alongside advanced driver-assistance systems providing a safer drive. The full hybrid model further highlights its technological edge in energy efficiency.
Ultimately, the choice between the Audi Q2 and Nissan Juke depends greatly on the driver's priorities. The Audi Q2 is aimed at those seeking a performance edge with luxurious features, while the Nissan Juke targets eco-conscious shoppers looking for efficiency and practicality with a hint of modernity. Regardless of your choice, both vehicles promise an exceptional driving experience in the ever-popular small SUV category.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Juke is somewhat cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Audi Q2 costs 24,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,472 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Audi Q2 with 4.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers considerably more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 157 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 5.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q2 delivers significantly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is very slightly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 56 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers marginally more boot space – 422 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q2 carries slightly more – 510 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 83 kg.
The Audi Q2 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.
details
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
|
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
127 - 183 g/km
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
|
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 510 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España