@ Audi AG
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Audi Q2 vs Mazda CX-30 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Two cars, one duel: Audi Q2 meets Mazda CX-30.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q2 @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi Q2 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24900 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 377 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q2 manages with 4.80 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 300 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q2 performs slightly better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 46 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q2 pulls evident stronger with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.

Q2 @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Audi Q2 is barely noticeable lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers barely noticeable more room – 430 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1406 L, which is about 356 L more than the Audi Q2.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q2 barely noticeable takes the win – 510 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Audi Q2 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Audi Q2 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £24,900
Q2 @ Audi AG

Audi Q2

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.8 - 8.1 L
details

Audi Q2

5 (1)
rate

The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.

details
A207341_overfull @ Audi AG
A207339_overfull @ Audi AG
A207364_overfull @ Audi AG
A207355_overfull @ Audi AG
A207349_overfull @ Audi AG
A207346_overfull @ Audi AG

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q2
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Audi Q2 stands out with its premium build quality and sharp handling, offering a luxury feel in a small package. Meanwhile, the Volkswagen Golf, beloved by many for its practicality and storied heritage, delivers a balanced ride with ample space and …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30
Q2 @ Audi AG
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
24900 - 43600 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
127 - 183 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1330 - 1610 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4208 - 4216 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1794 - 1802 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1495 - 1508 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1000 - 1050 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
450 - 510 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
197 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q2
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and Volvo XC40 stand out with their distinctive designs and premium features. The Q2 impresses with its sportier handling and sleek aesthetics, while the XC40 offers a spacious, practical interior along with advanced safety technologies. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.