VS

Audi Q2 vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (300 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (24,900 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q2 or Mazda CX-30?

Audi Q2 vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Audi Q2

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
details

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q2

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Audi Q2 is barely cheaper – starting at 24,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 377 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q2 uses 4.8 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 offers visibly more power – delivering 300 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q2 delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.

Q2

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q2 is marginally lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers marginally more boot space – 430 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q2 carries very slightly more – 510 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q2 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,900
Q2

Audi Q2

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 300 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q2

The Audi Q2 packs Audi’s premium attitude into a compact, cheeky package that turns city streets into a runway for tasteful design and clever practicality. It’s an easy car to live with thanks to an upscale cabin, composed manners and sprightly handling, and while it won’t satisfy someone chasing sports-car thrills, it’s a smart, stylish pick for buyers who want substance with a wink.

details
A207341_overfull
A207339_overfull
A207364_overfull
A207355_overfull
A207349_overfull
A207346_overfull

Reviews Audi Q2

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
miles
14 Feb 2026, 20:00:47

ive really enjoyed my 2 audi q2s and still looking for a match .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Rafa
25 Apr 2026, 12:50:49

I wouldn't pay more than 40,000 for a 1.5 L engine — that's excessive.

Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q2
VW Golf
VS
The Audi Q2 trades the Golf’s down-to-earth practicality for a dash of city-cool style and a slightly raised driving position, so you’ll arrive looking sharper — but with a bit less rear-seat space and often a higher price. For buyers who value sensible packaging, ride comfort and everyday …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Audi A3 Sportback
Audi Q2
VS
In the latest face-off between the Audi A3 Sportback and the Audi Q2, enthusiasts will find two distinct approaches to premium compact motoring. The A3 Sportback impresses with its sleek design and dynamic driving experience, while the Q2 offers a more adventurous, SUV-inspired stance that caters …
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Lexus UX and the Mazda CX-30, both models stand out in the competitive compact crossover segment, yet they cater to different priorities. The Lexus UX excels with its luxurious interior and top-notch safety features, making it a desirable choice for those …
Audi Q2
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique blend of style, technology, and performance. While the Q2 offers a more premium feel with its luxurious interior and refined driving dynamics, the T-Roc appeals with its practicality and slightly …
Audi Q2
Lexus LBX
VS
In the competitive segment of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q2 and Lexus LBX present distinct approaches to style and performance. The Q2 boasts a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who prioritize an engaging driving experience, while the LBX emphasizes comfort and a …
Audi Q2
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
24,900 - 43,600 £
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
127 - 183 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,610 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 405 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,794 - 1,802 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 510 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 300 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 400 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 221 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.