What drivetrain options does the Audi Q2 have?

The Audi Q2 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Audi Q2?

Depending on the version, the Audi Q2 delivers up to 300 HP.

How much fuel does the Audi Q2 use?

On average, the Audi Q2 consumes 4.80 L.

What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-30 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.70 L.

Audi Q2 vs Mazda CX-30 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q2

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi Q2 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24900 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 377 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Audi Q2 manages with 4.80 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q2 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 300 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q2 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 3.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q2 pulls evident stronger with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.

Q2

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Audi Q2 is barely noticeable lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 125 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers barely noticeable more room – 430 L compared to 405 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

When it comes to payload, Audi Q2 barely noticeable takes the win – 510 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 14 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q2 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Audi Q2

4.7 (3 Reviews)

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma

Mazda CX-30

VS

In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 …

Audi Q2

VW Golf

VS

The Audi Q2 trades the Golf’s down-to-earth practicality for a dash of city-cool style and a slightly raised driving position, so you’ll arrive looking sharper — but with a bit less rear-seat space and often a higher price. For buyers who value sensible packaging, ride comfort and everyday …

Costs and Consumption
Price 24900 - 43600 £	Price 25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km 4.8 - 8.1 L	Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 127 - 183 g/km	co2 129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors -
Curb weight 1330 - 1610 kg	Curb weight 1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity 355 - 405 L	Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L
Length -	Length -
Width 1794 - 1802 mm	Width 1795 mm
Height -	Height -
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity -
Payload 450 - 510 kg	Payload 458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Diesel	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 116 - 300 HP	Power HP 140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.9 - 10.5 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed -
Torque 200 - 400 Nm	Torque 238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 85 - 221 kW	Power kW 103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity 999 - 1984 cm3	Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3