In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique blend of style, technology, and performance. While the Q2 offers a more premium feel with its luxurious interior and refined driving dynamics, the T-Roc appeals with its practicality and slightly sportier design. Ultimately, both models deliver impressive versatility and are well-equipped to cater to the diverse needs of modern drivers.
The subcompact SUV segment has gained immense popularity in recent years, with consumers seeking a blend of practicality, style, and performance. Among the frontrunners in this category are the Audi Q2 and the VW T-Roc. Both vehicles share a similar DNA, given their close familial ties under the Volkswagen Group banner. Yet, they each carve out their unique identity in the fiercely competitive market. Here, we delve into a detailed comparison of these two dynamic SUVs.
The Audi Q2 boasts a bold and edgy design, characterized by its distinctive octagonal grille, well-defined lines, and sharp LED headlights. With a length of 4208 mm, width of 1794 mm, and height of 1508 mm, it presents a compact yet muscular exterior.
In contrast, the VW T-Roc has a slightly larger stature, measuring 4236 mm in length and 1819 mm in width, which contributes to its more robust appearance. Its high-mounted headlights and dynamic silhouette offer a versatile look that appeals to a broader audience. The T-Roc stands at a height of 1584 mm, giving it a commanding presence on the road.
Both the Q2 and T-Roc are available with a selection of petrol and diesel engines, ensuring that performance aligns with consumer needs. The Q2 offers engines ranging from 116 to 300 HP, with turbocharged options that provide a thrilling acceleration. The sporty variant can sprint from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, emphasizing Audi's commitment to performance.
The T-Roc presents a slightly lower power band, with options that peak at 300 HP as well. However, its engines are meticulously tuned for efficiency, with the smallest engine delivering an impressive fuel consumption of just 4.7 L/100 km. The acceleration figures show a slightly slower response, with the best model achieving 0-100 km/h in 4.9 seconds, mirroring its Audi counterpart.
Both SUVs offer manual and automatic transmission options, including the highly praised dual-clutch automatic gearbox. The Q2 features both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations for versatile handling on various terrains.
Similarly, the T-Roc offers the same transmission choices, allowing drivers to select their preferred driving experience. The Quattro all-wheel-drive system available on the Q2 gives it a slight edge in terms of dynamic handling and stability, particularly in challenging road conditions.
Inside, the Audi Q2 showcases a blend of luxury and advanced technology. Its minimalist cockpit is intuitive, featuring a virtual cockpit display and high-quality materials throughout. With a trunk capacity of 405 liters, it provides ample space for cargo while maintaining a compact feel.
The T-Roc, on the other hand, prioritizes practicality with a slightly larger trunk capacity of 445 liters. It's also equipped with the latest infotainment features, including a user-friendly touchscreen interface and optional digital cockpit, ensuring connectivity and convenience on the go.
Both vehicles are equipped with a suite of safety features that have earned them high ratings in crash tests. Standard offerings include adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and autonomous emergency braking. Audi's top-tier safety technology ensures the Q2 is well-prepared for any driving scenario, while the T-Roc matches those capabilities closely.
Ultimately, the choice between the Audi Q2 and VW T-Roc hinges on personal preferences. The Q2 leans towards luxury and sportiness, appealing to those who prioritize brand prestige and refined performance. Meanwhile, the T-Roc stands out with its practicality, slightly larger dimensions, and excellent value proposition.
Both SUVs represent the best of their segment, offering a blend of style, performance, and modern technology. Whichever you choose, both the Audi Q2 and the VW T-Roc promise a driving experience that is hard to match in today’s competitive landscape.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24500 - 43300
£
|
Price
about 23900 - 45500
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 8.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 8.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
127 - 190
g/km
|
co2
125 - 194
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
2 - 5
|
Curb weight
1330 - 1610
kg
|
Curb weight
1304 - 1578
kg
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 405
L
|
Trunk capacity
284 - 445
L
|
Length
4208 - 4216
mm
|
Length
4236 - 4271
mm
|
Width
1794 - 1802
mm
|
Width
1811 - 1819
mm
|
Height
1495 - 1508
mm
|
Height
1527 - 1584
mm
|
Payload
450 - 510
kg
|
Payload
368 - 509
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
116 - 300
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 300
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 10.5
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 12.3
s
|
Max Speed
197 - 250
km/h
|
Max Speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
Torque
200 - 400
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 400
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
85 - 221
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 221
kW
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
197 - 250
km/h
|
Top speed
187 - 250
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
VW
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.